research: porta artefatti da strategy-research-calendar (tracks F-I + eval crypto_backtest + lead OPZIONI/VRP)

Dal branch parallelo strategy-research-calendar (continuazione della linea TP01). Porta su main il
record di ricerca + la fondazione del lead opzioni (NIENTE blob dati, niente codice in conflitto):
- Tracks F/G/H/I (seasonality/calendar, prior-levels, volume-vol, momentum-reversal): tutti
  NEGATIVI/spurii -> confermano il soffitto Sharpe ~1.3 su BTC/ETH direzionale (calendar = buy&hold
  travestito; mean-reversion morta anche a fee 0). Diari + script.
- trackD_lookahead_audit.py: audit anti-look-ahead (stesso esito del nostro fix >=12h).
- eval-crypto-backtest-options.md: valutazione strategia esterna crypto_backtest. Cross-valida TP01
  (il loro sleeve spot 12h ~ TP01: due ricerche indipendenti, stessa conclusione). Identifica il
  LEAD: sleeve income OPZIONI (vendita put settimanali delta-0.28, VRP IV>RV), scorrelato ~0.22 al
  trend -> via per superare il soffitto ~1.3.
- options_real_quote_check.py + cerbero-bite-mainnet-verified.md: VERIFICATO su QUOTE REALI Deribit
  mainnet (cerbero-bite/MCP = mainnet, bit-identico a ccxt.deribit). Premio reale (BID, con skew) =
  1.29x il modellato -> il backtest SOTTOSTIMA il premio; il rischio vero e' la CODA (short-vol) +
  liquidita' di roll in stress, non la magnitudine.

NB: lo sleeve opzioni e' un LEAD, NON deployato: prezzato da modello (BS su DVOL) + 1 snapshot in
regime calmo. Serve validazione real-chain multi-regime + stress crash + paper su testnet prima di
aggiungerlo al portafoglio. Portafoglio attivo invariato: TP01 70% + XS01 30%.

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Adriano Dal Pastro
2026-06-19 20:24:16 +00:00
parent 790caefd52
commit 87af03955c
12 changed files with 2692 additions and 0 deletions
@@ -0,0 +1,65 @@
# 2026-06-19 — Cerbero-bite = MAINNET reale: fonte VRP sbloccata
Indagine "cerca dati di cerbero-bite" + verifica mainnet/testnet a tre livelli. Esito: la
contaminazione storica NON era una proprieta' di Cerbero MCP, ma del vecchio token testnet sul
solo endpoint `get_historical`. Il token di cerbero-bite e' mainnet e serve catene opzioni reali.
## Dove sono i dati di cerbero-bite
`/home/adriano/Documenti/Git_XYZ/CerberoSuite/Cerbero_Bite` — bot live (testnet exec, propose-only)
che vende **credit-spread bull-put su ETH**. Dati:
- `data/state.sqlite`: `market_snapshots` (**52 righe, solo 30 apr1 mag 2026**, BTC+ETH) con
`spot, dvol, realized_vol_30d, iv_minus_rv, funding_perp/cross, dealer_net_gamma,
gamma_flip_level, oi_delta_pct_4h, liquidation_long/short_risk, macro_days_to_event`;
`dvol_history` (1 riga); `positions/instructions/decisions` (0 righe, niente trade persistiti).
- `data/log/*.jsonl` (26 apr1 mag 2026): log HTTP, non dump di catena. `strategy.yaml`: golden config.
- **Fonte dati**: Cerbero MCP (`get_instruments` + `get_ticker_batch`) dal gateway
`cerbero-mcp.tielogic.xyz`. NON c'e' storico profondo della catena (solo fetch live/on-demand).
## Verifica mainnet vs testnet (3 livelli)
1. **Spot vs nostra serie certificata** (Deribit mainnet), 2026-04-30 1316h UTC:
BTC cerbero 76.28776.446 vs certificato 76.23776.443 (Δ 0.130.27%); ETH 2.2612.264 vs
2.2562.265 (Δ 0.040.29%). Scarti = rumore intra-barra (snapshot 15-min vs close orario).
NON e' il feed fantasma testnet (che divergeva >3%).
2. **`environment_info`** (token cerbero-bite): `environment=mainnet`, `base_url=www.deribit.com`,
`source=credentials`. **`get_ticker ETH-PERPETUAL`**: `testnet=false`, mark 1703.11.
3. **Catena, decisivo** — stessa opzione su ccxt.deribit mainnet vs Cerbero MCP:
`ETH_USDC-26JUN26-1650-P` (put settimanale, delta ~-0.28):
| fonte | bid | ask | mark_iv | delta | testnet |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| ccxt mainnet | 25.6 | 26.6 | 54.54% | -0.3150 | — |
| Cerbero MCP | 25.6 | 26.6 | 54.54% | -0.31513 | False |
**Identici bit-per-bit.**
## Verdetto
- **Il token MCP di cerbero-bite e' MAINNET; la sua catena opzioni e' reale** (= ccxt.deribit
mainnet). La contaminazione di PythagorasGoal era il vecchio downloader con token **testnet** su
`get_historical` (barre OHLCV fantasma), non Cerbero MCP in se'.
- **Fonte VRP sbloccata**: Cerbero MCP da' bid/ask/IV/greche/OI per-strike (come ccxt) **+** feature
di regime che ccxt non ha (`dealer_net_gamma`, `gamma_flip_level`, `oi_delta_pct_4h`,
`liquidation_*`, `funding`, `iv_minus_rv`, `macro`). Utile per validare lo sleeve VRP su piu'
regimi (raccolta snapshot live + accumulo nel tempo).
- **Limite residuo**: niente storico profondo della catena -> il backtest pluriennale del VRP resta
prezzato da modello (DVOL+BS); ma la calibrazione model-vs-reale e' ora robusta e ripetibile
(snapshot reali su piu' date/regimi).
## Collegamento col lavoro VRP (sleeve opzioni)
Conferma e rafforza `2026-06-19-eval-crypto-backtest-options.md`: lo snapshot ccxt aveva gia'
mostrato che il backtest SOTTOSTIMA il premio (skew +28% > spread 4% -> bid reale = 1.29x modello).
Ora abbiamo due fonti mainnet concordi (ccxt + Cerbero MCP) per misurare premio/skew/spread su piu'
regimi. La cautela centrale resta il **rischio di coda** dello short-vol, non la magnitudine del premio.
## Stato cerbero-bite (gia' concluso, contesto)
Il credit-spread bull-put ETH e' gia' stato giudicato NON robusto su ciclo completo (diario
`Old/docs/diary/2026-06-09-cerbero-bite-credit-spread.md`: EV breakeven-negativo; "+0.48%/mese" =
artefatto di finestra calma; coda concentrata col fade ETH). E' una struttura diversa dalla
put-selling/wheel del progetto `crypto_backtest`.
> Sicurezza: il token di cerbero-bite e' stato usato solo per la verifica; mai stampato ne' committato
> (resta in `.env`, gitignored).
@@ -0,0 +1,125 @@
# 2026-06-19 — Valutazione strategia esterna `crypto_backtest` (trend + opzioni VRP)
Valutazione critica di un progetto esterno (`/home/adriano/crypto_backtest/`, file chiave
`STRATEGIA.md`, `production.py`, `options_deribit.py`, `production_equity.csv`) che propone un
book a 2 motori quasi scorrelati. Rilevante perché tocca proprio la frontiera che la nostra
ricerca post-reset ha lasciato aperta (le opzioni / volatility risk premium).
## Cosa propone
Portafoglio a due gambe (ρ=0.22 verificato dal CSV):
- **Sleeve 1 (25%)** — trend spot BTC+ETH a **12h**, long-only se `trend(30g)>0`, vol-target 20%,
cap 3×, leva globale ~1.07 calibrata a maxDD in-sample 20%.
- **Sleeve 2 (75%)** — vendita di **put settimanali (CSP/wheel) su BTC** su Deribit, strike a
**delta 0.28**, hold-to-expiry, IV da DVOL reale, prezzo Black-Scholes.
Numeri riprodotti dal CSV (finestra 2021-04→2026-06, 272 settimane):
| Serie | CAGR | Sharpe | maxDD | final |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| spot | +12.0% | 0.77 | 18.1% | 1.80x |
| opt | +15.9% | 1.09 | 20.0% | 2.16x |
| **blend 25/75** | +15.4% | **1.21** | **15.2%** | 2.10x |
| blend ri-levato | +20.5% | 1.21 | 20.0% | 2.63x |
| B&H BTC | +1.3% | 0.30 | 74.2% | 1.07x |
corr(spot, opt) = **0.217** confermata. Settimane peggiori opt: 2022-05 (LUNA) 13%,
2022-06 11%, 2021-05 11%, 2022-11 (FTX) 9.7%.
## Punto forte — corroborazione indipendente del nostro TP01
Lo **sleeve spot è quasi identico al nostro TP01** (`src/strategies/trend_portfolio.py`):
12h, long-only, trend(30g), vol-target 20%, cap 3×. Due ricerche separate, due dataset diversi
(loro Binance, noi Deribit certificato), **stessa conclusione**: il trend vol-targeted a 12h è
l'edge reale e robusto. Il nostro Sharpe è più alto (1.32 vs 0.77 su questa finestra / 1.07
full-history) perché usiamo un **blend multi-orizzonte 1-3-6m** invece del singolo trend a 30g →
il blend diversifica gli orizzonti e alza lo Sharpe. Conferma forte per entrambi.
NB: loro confermano anche le NOSTRE lezioni — intraday ≤1h scartato (costi/rumore), un **bug di
look-ahead sul 4h trovato e corretto** (identico al nostro audit), MR/condor/strangle nudi e
collar stretti scartati per overfit/tail.
## Punto critico — lo sleeve opzioni guida il 75% ma è prezzato dal proprio modello
È esattamente il muro che avevamo dichiarato non-backtestabile (W18/19/21, ARGO: niente storico
chain per-strike gratis). Il loro workaround (BS su **DVOL reale** + payoff sul path realizzato)
fa emergere il VRP perché IV>RV (misurato BTC IV/RV~1.24). Concettualmente sano, ma la
**magnitudine è ottimistica** — limiti (in parte ammessi dagli autori):
1. **Nessun bid/ask**: vendono al mid (BS fair), non al bid. Sulle put OTM settimanali lo spread
è grosso → premio reale nettamente inferiore.
2. **Skew ignorato**: prezzano put a delta-0.28 (OTM) con DVOL = **IV ATM**. Il mercato carica le
put molto di più (skew di crash) → modellano la vol sbagliata proprio sull'opzione venduta.
3. **Coda sotto-modellata**: settimana peggiore solo 13% attraverso LUNA/FTX → sospettosamente
benigno per un venditore di put nudo. Gap, illiquidità di roll e settlement inverso (coin-settled)
sono approssimati.
4. **Leva senza funding** (ottimistico) + **bias di finestra** (parte vicino al top 2021,
favorevole a un book short-vol DD-capped).
Il blend Sharpe 1.21 è dominato dallo sleeve income (Sharpe 1.09, peso 75%). Con bid/ask + skew +
coda realistica lo sleeve income vale plausibilmente molto meno (Sharpe reale stimato ~0.7-0.9),
e il blend scende di conseguenza.
## Verdetto
- **Lo spot conferma il nostro TP01** → ottima validazione incrociata; nessuna azione necessaria
se non notare che il nostro blend multi-orizzonte è leggermente migliore.
- **Lo sleeve opzioni è il lead più promettente per superare il soffitto Sharpe ~1.3**, perché
aggiunge una fonte di rendimento di natura DIVERSA (volatility risk premium), proprio ciò che i
nostri 9 track (A-I) non hanno trovato dentro il puro direzionale BTC/ETH. La combinazione
trend (lungo-vol) + short-vol income è strutturalmente sana e la ρ=0.22 è reale.
- **MA i suoi numeri vanno dimezzati mentalmente** finché non girano su prezzi reali. Il 75% di
allocazione a un edge prezzato dal proprio modello è il rischio n.1.
## Prossimi passi onesti se si vuole inseguire questo lead
1. **Quote reali Deribit** (bid/ask), anche solo recenti: misurare il premio reale vs modellato
sulle put delta-0.28 settimanali, e quanto Sharpe sopravvive allo spread.
2. **Prezzare allo skew vero** (IV della put OTM, non DVOL ATM).
3. **Stress su una settimana di crash a prezzi reali/illiquidi** (rollabilità, assignment, gap).
4. **Paper trading su Deribit testnet** dello sleeve opzioni prima di qualsiasi capitale.
Coerente con la regola del progetto (lezione v2.0.0): un edge full+OOS robusto su prezzi MODELLATI
non è un edge finché non è verificato su prezzi reali ed eseguibili.
---
## AGGIORNAMENTO — verifica su QUOTE REALI Deribit (`scripts/research/options_real_quote_check.py`)
Fatta la verifica concreta (PARTE 1: catena reale Deribit mainnet pubblico; PARTE 2: ri-esecuzione
dello sleeve CSP con haircut reale sul premio). **Risultato che RIBALTA una mia critica.**
Snapshot del 2026-06-19, scadenza settimanale 2026-06-26 (~6.2 DTE), put delta 0.277 (strike 61k,
3.1% OTM), underlying 62.965:
| Grandezza | Valore |
|---|---|
| IV ATM (≈ DVOL) | 37.2% |
| IV put OTM (mark) | 42.1% (**skew +4.8 pt**) |
| premio put: BID / mark / ask | 598 / 623 / 630 USD |
| spread bid/mark | 0.96 (spread ~4%) |
| premio MODELLATO dal backtest (BS @ IV-ATM) | **463 USD** |
| **HAIRCUT premio reale(BID)/modello** | **1.29** |
**Il backtest SOTTOSTIMA il premio, non lo sovrastima.** Prezzando la put OTM con la DVOL (IV ATM)
ignora lo skew (+28% sul premio lordo); il bid/ask la riporta giu' solo del 4% → vendendo al BID
reale incassi **1.29×** il premio modellato. Lo sleeve modellato (Sharpe 1.13) e' quindi
**conservativo sul premio** alle quote attuali; col premio reale salirebbe (Sharpe → 1.83 a f=1.29).
**Ma la critica vera si SPOSTA, non sparisce:** lo skew esiste perche' il mercato prezza la coda
grassa: piu' premio = esattamente perche' i crash fanno male. La sensitivity mostra il punto di
rottura — lo sleeve regge finche' incassi >~85% del premio modellato (Sharpe 0.59 a f=0.85), va a
zero a f=0.70, negativo a f=0.55. Lo snapshot e' in **regime calmo** (IV ATM 37%, bassa per crypto);
in un crash lo spread si allarga molto e potresti non riuscire a rollare. Quindi:
-**Concern "premio sovrastimato" = SMENTITO** (alle quote attuali e' anzi sottostimato).
- ⚠️ **Concern "rischio di coda + spread in stress" = CONFERMATO e ora e' IL rischio centrale.**
Il backtest cattura i crash realizzati 2021-26 (DD 20%) ma non l'intera distribuzione di code
possibili, e usa spread calmi. La f reale in settimana di crash e' < 1 e lo spread esplode.
**Verdetto aggiornato:** lo sleeve income e' piu' solido di quanto temessi sul *premio* (il VRP +
skew e' reale e generoso), ma resta una strategia short-vol il cui rischio vero e' la **coda** e la
**liquidita' di roll nello stress**, non la magnitudine del premio. Prima del capitale: ripetere lo
snapshot nel tempo (specie in regimi di IV alta), misurare lo spread in giornate di stress, e
paper-trade su testnet. Il lead per superare il soffitto Sharpe ~1.3 (aggiungere il VRP a TP01)
resta valido e ora meglio quantificato.
@@ -0,0 +1,77 @@
# Track F — Calendar seasonality (hour-of-day / day-of-week) on BTC & ETH
**Data:** 2026-06-19 · **Script:** `scripts/research/trackF_seasonality.py`
**Dati:** Deribit mainnet certificati, BTC/ETH 1h UTC. Fee baseline 0.10% RT (`fee_side=0.0005`).
## Domanda
Esiste un edge di calendario *sistematico e tradeable* (ora del giorno, giorno della
settimana, interazione ora×giorno) su BTC ed ETH, netto fee, OOS, per-anno, su entrambi gli asset?
## Metodologia (anti-overfit, anti-leakage)
- `ret[i]=close[i]/close[i-1]-1` è noto a `close[i]`; una posizione decisa a `close[i]` guadagna
`ret[i+1]`. La statistica che decide il trade usa **solo barre ≤ i** (mai la barra tradata né futuro).
- **Tradeable test onesto = ADAPTIVE EXPANDING sign**: a `close[i]` guardo il bucket di calendario
della barra `i+1` (il clock è noto, zero look-ahead) e prendo il **segno della media passata** di
quel bucket (espandente, warmup-gated). Long-flat o long-short. Fee solo su `|Δposizione|`.
È l'analogo onesto di "tradare il seasonal": i dati scelgono il segno di ogni bucket **dal vivo**.
- Tabelle descrittive per-ora/per-giorno split IS(65%)/OOS(35%) come diagnostica.
- Regola discreta ottimizzata in-sample (entra a ora H, tieni W barre, dir migliore) mostrata solo
per **esporre il gap IS→OOS** (384 celle testate/asset).
- Benchmark **buy-and-hold** come controllo del long-bias.
## Risultati
### 1. Descrittive (bp/barra, IS vs OOS)
- **Hour-of-day:** sign-agreement IS/OOS solo **12/24 (BTC)** e **8/24 (ETH)** → caso. Le ore "US
close" 21:0022:00 UTC sono positive in entrambi gli split su entrambi gli asset (l'unico pattern
con un minimo di coerenza), ma il resto è rumore che cambia segno tra IS e OOS.
- **Day-of-week:** più stabile. **Giovedì negativo** su BTC ed ETH in IS *e* OOS; Lun/Mer positivi.
Sign-agreement 6/7 (BTC), 5/7 (ETH).
### 2. Adaptive expanding-sign (il test tradeable)
| Strategia | BTC Sharpe | ETH Sharpe | Note |
|---|---|---|---|
| HOUR long-short | **5.39** | **4.04** | DD 100%. Annientata dalle fee. |
| HOUR long-flat | 2.92 | 2.09 | DD 100%. Idem. |
| DOW long-short | +0.64 | +0.83 | DD 8284%, 66% nel 2022 |
| DOW long-flat | +0.81 | +0.96 | DD 7578%, 64/66% nel 2022 |
| HOUR×WEEKDAY (168 buckets) | 5.05 | 3.96 | DD 100%. Overfit puro + fee. |
### 3. Il controllo che smonta il DOW — **buy-and-hold**
- BTC buy-hold: **Sharpe 0.79, CAGR 34.9%, DD 77%** → DOW long-flat: Sh 0.81, CAGR 34.2%, DD 77.5%.
- ETH buy-hold: **Sharpe 0.84, CAGR 42.4%, DD 81%** → DOW long-flat: Sh 0.96, CAGR 52.7%, DD 74%.
- Il DOW long-flat è **long il 78% del tempo** (`mean_pos≈+0.78`). È **buy-and-hold travestito**:
guadagna perché crypto sale, non perché esiste un edge di giorno. Lo "skip del giovedì" aggiunge
pochissimo e non giustifica un deploy.
### 4. Fee sweep (HOUR long-short adaptive)
A fee **0%**: Sh +0.61 (BTC) / +0.80 (ETH) — solo long-drift. A 0.10% RT: **5.4 / 4.0**. Turnover
**~8.000 flip/anno** (segno orario instabile, cambia quasi ogni barra) → morte istantanea per fee.
Le strategie hour-of-day sono ad alta frequenza per costruzione: le fee sono di prim'ordine e le
uccidono.
### 5. Regola discreta ottimizzata in-sample (trappola multiple-testing)
- BTC: best IS H=05 hold=24h dir=+1 → **IS Sh +4.25 → OOS Sh +1.47** (+3.7 bp/trade).
- ETH: best IS H=13 hold=24h dir=+1 → **IS Sh +7.35 → OOS Sh +0.90** (+3.2 bp/trade).
- Collasso IS→OOS classico. Inoltre "hold 24h dir+1" = ancora **long-bias** (entra una volta/giorno
e tiene 24h ≈ sempre long). Il margine OOS (~3 bp/trade su 10 bp RT) è marginale e fragile.
## Multiple-testing
199 celle di calendario/asset (24 ore + 7 giorni + 168 ora×giorno) + 384 (H,W,dir)/asset. Con così
tante celle, bucket "significativi" spuri sono **garantiti**. Filtri applicati: segno scelto dal vivo
su soli dati passati, deve reggere OOS, per-anno, e su **entrambi** BTC ed ETH.
## Verdetto — **SPURIO / NON deployable**
- **Nessun edge di calendario netto-fee robusto** su BTC ed ETH.
- **Hour-of-day:** morto (fee + segno instabile). L'unica regolarità (US-close 2122 UTC positiva) è
troppo debole e non sopravvive al turnover.
- **Day-of-week:** l'unico risultato "positivo" è **long-bias mascherato** (≈ buy-and-hold,
Sharpe ~0.80.96 < trend portfolio 1.32, DD 7584% rovinoso, 65% nel 2022). Non è un edge
seasonal sfruttabile; è esposizione direzionale al drift di crypto.
- **Hour×weekday:** overfit puro (IS 3.6 → OOS 8.0).
- Coerente con la lezione del progetto: dove l'unica "direzione" che funziona è essere long, non c'è
alpha di timing — c'è beta. Il trend portfolio (TP01) cattura quel beta in modo vol-targeted e
con DD ~12%, infinitamente meglio di qualunque regola di calendario qui.
**Azione:** track F chiuso negativo. Non aggiungere nulla al portafoglio. Il soffitto Sharpe ~1.3 su
BTC/ETH regge.
@@ -0,0 +1,85 @@
# Track G — Prior-period level breakouts / range (BTC & ETH, calendar-anchored)
**Data:** 2026-06-19 · **Script:** `scripts/research/trackG_prior_levels.py`
**Harness:** `src/backtest/harness.py` (honest, entry decided at `close[i]`, fill `close[i]`).
## Domanda
Esistono edge net-positivi OOS, robusti su BTC **e** ETH, definiti rispetto a un **periodo
calendario precedente** (giorno/settimana/opening-range)? E soprattutto: i breakout di livello
**continuano** (trend) o **rientrano** (fade)?
## No look-ahead (garanzie)
- Livelli prior-day/week costruiti aggregando a barre giornaliere/settimanali (UTC) e poi
**`shift(1)`** sul frame del periodo *chiuso*: il periodo corrente vede solo il precedente
totalmente chiuso. Mai "oggi"/"questa settimana" nel livello.
- Opening-range usato **solo** sulle barre dopo la chiusura della finestra di apertura.
- Direzione + prezzo decisi a `close[i]`, fill a `close[i]`. Mai entry sul livello esatto intrabar.
- Bug iniziale corretto: mismatch tz-aware vs tz-naive nel mapping dei livelli (dava 0 trade).
## Risultati (1h, fee 0.10% RT, leva 1x, OOS 65/35)
### Continuation vs FADE — il verdetto è netto
| Regola (PD = prior-day) | BTC OOS | ETH OOS | Sharpe OOS |
|---|---|---|---|
| **PD-high CONT (long su rottura max ieri)** | **+25%** | **+16%** | +0.5 / +0.3 |
| PD-high FADE | **68%** | **68%** | 1.6 / 1.2 |
| PD-low CONT (short su rottura min ieri) | 33% | 60% | 0.5 / 0.8 |
| PD-low FADE | 36% | 8% | 0.6 / +0.1 |
- **I breakout CONTINUANO, non rientrano.** Il lato FADE è robustamente **negativo** su entrambi
gli asset (sia high che low), su prior-day, prior-week e opening-range. Conferma diretta della
tesi del reset: la mean-reversion / fade è morta su dati certificati.
- **Asimmetria long-only:** funziona solo la rottura del **massimo** (long), non quella del
**minimo** (short). Cioè non è un edge di breakout *simmetrico/direzione-neutro*: è cattura del
**drift/trend rialzista** del cripto. La PD-low-cont (short sui breakdown) perde perché in questo
campione il cripto sale.
### Grid robustness (PASS 6) — survivor = OOS>0 su ENTRAMBI
- **PD-high CONT: 3/3 celle** (buffer 0/0.1%/0.3%) positive OOS su BTC **e** ETH → robusto al buffer.
- PD-high fade, PD-low cont/fade, OR-fade: **0 survivor**.
- **OR-cont:** positiva solo su ETH, negativa su BTC su tutte le finestre (3/6/8/12h) → artefatto
mono-asset, scartato dalla regola "entrambi".
### Anchor-hour sweep (PASS 5) — non è un'ora fortunata
PD-high cont positiva su **21/24** ore UTC (BTC) e **20/24** (ETH). Non dipende da un singolo
anchor → coerente con un edge reale (ma vedi sotto: è beta di trend).
### Fee sweep + per-anno (PD-high cont, full sample)
```
BTC RT%: 0.00→+571 0.05→+289 0.10→+126 0.15→ +31 0.20→ 24 (OOS: +84/+52/+25/+3/15)
ETH RT%: 0.00→+1754 0.05→+1012 0.10→+567 0.15→+299 0.20→+139 (OOS: +67/+39/+16/3/19)
BTC per-anno: 2019 +39 2020 +104 2021 +7 2022 42 2023 +24 2024 +27 2025 16 2026 +3
ETH per-anno: 2020 +164 2021 +160 2022 +7 2023 +1 2024 +12 2025 4 2026 +7
Sharpe full: BTC +0.48 (maxDD 55%, €/d 2k +0.88) · ETH +0.86 (maxDD 34%, €/d 2k +4.27)
```
- **Fee-fragile:** alla baseline 0.10% RT sopravvive (OOS +25/+16%), ma muore già a ~0.15-0.20% RT.
Margine di fee sottile (≈1.5x baseline e l'edge sparisce su OOS). ~1000-1100 trade in 8 anni.
- **Drawdown enormi** (BTC 55%) e anni negativi (2022 42% BTC, 2025 16%).
## Verdetto
- **Sì, esiste un edge net-positivo OOS su entrambi gli asset:** *PD-high continuation* (long
quando `close` supera il massimo di ieri, exit a fine giornata UTC). Robusto al buffer e
all'anchor-hour. **MA non è deployabile come miglioramento:**
1. È **long-only drift capture**, non un breakout simmetrico (il lato short fallisce) → è una
versione **più debole e ridondante** del Trend Portfolio TP01 (Sharpe 0.48-0.86 vs 1.32).
2. **Fee-fragile** (muore a ~1.5x la fee baseline) e con **drawdown** molto peggiori.
- **Il contributo scientifico vero è la conferma della direzione:** sui dati certificati i
breakout di livello-calendario **CONTINUANO**; il fade è morto (negativo robusto su PD/PW/OR,
entrambi gli asset). Nessuna sorpresa mean-reversion nascosta nei livelli giornalieri/settimanali.
- **Niente di nuovo da mettere in produzione.** TP01 resta la strategia vincente; i breakout
prior-period non aggiungono Sharpe (stessa beta di trend, peggio eseguita).
## Come riprodurre
```bash
uv run python scripts/research/trackG_prior_levels.py # full (1h + 15m, ~25s)
uv run python scripts/research/trackG_prior_levels.py --quick # 1h only
```
@@ -0,0 +1,71 @@
# Track H — Volume, Range & Volatility-Regime signals (BTC/ETH, certified, >=12h)
**Date:** 2026-06-19
**Script:** `scripts/research/trackH_volume_vol.py` (runnable, self-contained)
**Question:** does any volume / range / volatility-regime signal ADD to the deployed winner
TP01 (vol-targeted trend portfolio, 12h, Sharpe ~1.32) — i.e. net-positive OOS on BOTH BTC &
ETH AND uncorrelated (|corr|<~0.3) — OR work as a regime filter that lifts TP01's Sharpe / cuts
its DD?
## Method (honest)
- Same causal per-bar engine as `TrendPortfolio.net_returns`: build a continuous TARGET decided
with data `<= close[i]`, HOLD it during bar `i+1` (`pos_held[t]=target[t-1]`), gross = pos×ret,
fee on `|Δpos|`. Identical in spirit to `harness.backtest_signals` (decide≤close[i], fill at
close[i]); two discrete signals cross-checked through `backtest_signals` directly.
- All features (volume z-score, OBV, ranges, realized vol) use prior/rolling windows shifted so
bar `i` sees only `<= i`. 12h/1d resampled from certified 1h via `resample_tf` (label='left'),
consumed index-based with the +1 hold → no open-label leak.
- Fee 0.10% RT baseline + sweep 0.000.40% RT. OOS 65/35 + per-year. Grid on BOTH assets.
Turnover and correlation-to-TP01 reported for every signal.
- **>=12h only** (12h + 1d). Sub-12h excluded per the standing lesson (fees + HF-noise overfit +
the 4h open-label look-ahead trap).
## Signals tested
VT-long (volatility-managed long), VolBreakout (volume-z-confirmed Donchian), OBV-trend,
VW-mom (volume-weighted momentum), RangeExpand (range-expansion breakout), NR7-break
(narrowest-range breakout), DeclVolRev (declining-volume fade/reversal). Plus regime overlays on
TP01: keep-low-vol, keep-high-vol, vol-managed ×1.5, OBV-up confirmation.
## Results (12h headline, fee 0.10% RT)
| signal | corr→TP01 | OOS Sharpe BTC/ETH | note |
|---|---|---|---|
| VT-long | 0.66 / 0.69 | 0.80 / 0.14 | trend-in-disguise; weak OOS ETH |
| VolBreakout | 0.69 / 0.71 | 0.54 / 0.49 | profitable but correlated |
| OBV-trend | 0.61 / 0.63 | 0.96 / 0.68 | profitable but correlated; turnover ~75/yr |
| VW-mom | 0.64 / 0.67 | 0.98 / 0.74 | basically TSMOM; correlated |
| RangeExpand | 0.48 / 0.49 | 0.37 / 1.04 | lower corr but BTC weak; ETH negative on 1d |
| NR7-break | 0.48 / 0.49 | 0.79 / 0.02 | fails OOS on ETH |
| DeclVolRev | -0.15 / -0.11 | -1.15 / -0.44 | **negative even at zero fee** |
Grid robustness (12h, % cells positive full+OOS on both assets): VW-mom 100%, VT-long 100%,
VolBreakout 96%, RangeExpand 96%, OBV-trend 75% — but the robust ones are precisely the ones
that are highly correlated to TP01. Fee sweep: trend-family signals survive to 0.40% RT;
DeclVolRev gets worse with fees (it trades constantly).
## Regime filters on TP01 (12h, 50/50 portfolio)
| variant | full Sharpe | OOS Sharpe | maxDD | CAGR | turn/y |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| **TP01 baseline** | **1.32** | 0.90 | 13.3% | 16.2% | 11.5 |
| × keep LOW-vol | 0.94 | 1.11 | 14.1% | 7.7% | 9.5 |
| × keep HIGH-vol | 0.98 | 0.18 | 9.9% | 7.9% | 4.9 |
| × vol-managed ×1.5 | 1.33 | 0.96 | 17.9% | 18.1% | 15.4 |
| × OBV-up only | 1.49 | 1.04 | 10.1% | 14.4% | 18.2 |
OBV-up filter across EMA span: full Sharpe 1.491.52 (span 1530), DD 710%, but OOS gain is
marginal (0.90→1.04 at span 30) and fades for span≥45 (OOS 0.690.73). It cuts ~2pp CAGR and
raises turnover ~60%.
## Verdict (honest)
- **No uncorrelated additive edge exists.** Every *profitable* volume/range/vol signal is trend
in disguise (corr 0.610.75 to TP01) → cannot raise the 50/50 portfolio Sharpe. The genuinely
lower-corr signals (RangeExpand, NR7 ~0.48) fail OOS on at least one asset.
- **Mean-reversion / declining-volume fade is dead** — negative net AND at zero fee on both
assets. Reconfirms the v2.0.0 contamination lesson; MR is not a real edge on certified data.
- **Vol-regime gating hurts** (keep-low / keep-high both drop Sharpe to ~0.95). The vol-managed
overlay is Sharpe-neutral but DD-worse.
- **The only non-harmful overlay is OBV-up trend-confirmation:** it cuts DD (13.3%→10.1%) and
nudges full Sharpe to ~1.49, but it is trend double-confirmation (de-risking), not new alpha;
it costs CAGR, raises turnover, and the OOS Sharpe gain is within noise and span-sensitive. It
is worth keeping in mind as a **defensive DD overlay**, not as a Sharpe improver.
- **Bottom line:** the ~1.3 portfolio-Sharpe ceiling on BTC/ETH-only **holds**. TP01 stays the
deployable winner. Volume/range/vol add nothing uncorrelated.
@@ -0,0 +1,99 @@
# Track I — Alternative momentum formulations + long-horizon reversal (2026-06-19)
**Script:** `scripts/research/trackI_momentum_reversal.py` (self-contained, runnable).
**Universe:** BTC & ETH only. **TF:** 12h + 1d (sub-12h excluded by rule). **Harness:** identical
honest machinery to TP01 — direction decided `<= close[i]`, positions held next bar (`pos_held[1:]
= tgt[:-1]`), vol-target by inverse PAST-ONLY realized vol (target 20%, lev cap 2x), NET fee 0.10%
RT on turnover, 50/50 BTC+ETH. OOS 65/35 + per-year + fee sweep (0.000.40% RT). Correlation to
TP01 net returns reported for every candidate.
## Goal
(A) A momentum formulation that BEATS or DIVERSIFIES the canonical 1-3-6m sign-blend (TP01,
Sharpe ~1.32). (B) Does the classic LONG-HORIZON REVERSAL (fade ~12m winners) give an
uncorrelated positive overlay?
## PART A — momentum formulations (12h, long-flat, vs TP01 Sharpe 1.32 / OOS 0.90 / DD 13.3%)
| formulation | Sharpe | IS | **OOS** | CAGR | maxDD | corr→TP01 | BTC | ETH |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| baseline sign-blend 1-3-6m | 1.32 | 1.54 | 0.90 | +16% | 13.3% | 1.00 | 1.15 | 1.10 |
| (i) z-score cum-return (tanh) | **1.35** | 1.63 | 0.85 | +12% | **8.4%** | 0.96 | 1.30 | 1.00 |
| (ii) risk-adjusted momentum | 1.27 | 1.49 | 0.84 | +13% | 9.5% | 0.97 | 1.21 | 1.00 |
| (iii) EMA-cross trend | 0.81 | 0.91 | 0.62 | +11% | 25.1% | 0.85 | 0.89 | 0.53 |
| (iii-b) MACD (calendar spans) | **1.50** | **1.87** | 0.74 | +22% | 17.7% | 0.69 | 1.30 | 1.32 |
| (iv) Donchian breakout | 1.10 | 1.36 | 0.57 | +17% | 25.0% | 0.86 | 1.08 | 0.82 |
| (v) acceleration (Δ-momentum) | 1.28 | 1.82 | 0.35 | +14% | 14.2% | 0.66 | 1.25 | 0.81 |
| (vi) 12-1 skip momentum | 0.67 | 0.79 | 0.47 | +9% | 24.5% | 0.68 | 0.70 | 0.49 |
Results are essentially identical at 1d. Read-out:
- **Nothing cleanly beats the sign-blend OOS on both assets.** The headline-Sharpe leaders are
artefacts of in-sample fit: **MACD** posts IS 1.87 but OOS collapses to 0.74 (gap = overfit) with
a worse DD (17.7%); **acceleration** IS 1.82 → OOS **0.35** (worst OOS decay of all). Both fail.
- **(i) z-score continuous momentum** is the one mild, honest refinement: Sharpe 1.35 (≈baseline)
but **maxDD 8.4% vs 13.3%** — the continuous score scales down position when the cumulative move
is statistically small, de-risking the tails. OOS 0.85 (slightly below baseline 0.90), CAGR drops
16%→12%. It's a smoother sibling of TP01, **not a new edge** (corr 0.96).
- (vi) 12-1 skip (classic equity "12-1" momentum) **does NOT help crypto**: skipping the recent
month removes the strongest part of the signal here → Sharpe 0.67, corr 0.68. Crypto momentum
lives in the recent window, opposite to the equity stylised fact.
- Breakout/Donchian and EMA-cross are strictly worse (high DD, weak OOS).
## PART B — long-horizon reversal (fade past winners), 12h
Long-short reversal (short ~12/18/24m winners, long losers, vol-targeted):
| reversal LS | Sharpe | OOS | CAGR | maxDD | corr→TP01 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 12m | -0.77 | -1.15 | -14% | 73% | -0.51 |
| 18m | -0.36 | -0.75 | -8% | 58% | -0.47 |
| 24m | **+0.04** | -0.07 | -1% | 43% | **-0.32** |
| 12-18-24m | -0.46 | -0.72 | -8% | 57% | -0.54 |
- **Long-horizon reversal is NOT a standalone edge.** Standalone it LOSES money (12m/18m strongly
negative; only 24m is ~flat at Sharpe 0.04, OOS 0.07, and even that fails "net-positive OOS on
both assets": BTC +0.10 / ETH 0.03). Fading crypto winners over a year just shorts the trend.
- It IS genuinely negatively correlated to TP01 (24m: corr 0.32; 12-18-24: 0.54), as expected
(it's the opposite sign of medium-term momentum).
- **Momentum + reversal blend** (long 1-6m momentum, brake on very-long extension): the variant
`mom(1-3-6) 0.5·rev(12-24)` is the most interesting single-strategy result — Sharpe **1.38**,
**OOS 0.98** (> baseline 0.90), **maxDD 10.6%** (< 13.3%), both assets positive (BTC 1.25/ETH
1.05), corr 0.91, fee-robust (1.43→1.22 across 0.000.40% RT). CAGR drops 16%→12%. It is TP01
with a long-term-extension brake: a modest *risk-adjusted* improvement, not more return.
## COMBINED — TP01 + best diversifier (blend net returns)
TP01 alone: Sharpe 1.321, CAGR +16%, maxDD 13.3%, OOS 0.90.
| combo | Sharpe | CAGR | maxDD | OOS | corr |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| TP01 + 20% reversal-24m (LS) | **1.411** | +13% | 11.5% | **1.06** | -0.32 |
| TP01 + 30% reversal-24m (LS) | 1.366 | +12% | 11.8% | 1.06 | -0.32 |
| TP01 + 20% reversal-12-18-24 (LS) | 1.350 | +11% | 10.6% | 0.84 | -0.54 |
| TP01 + 50% z-score | 1.348 | +14% | 9.5% | 0.89 | +0.96 |
- Adding a small slice of **reversal-24m long-short** lifts portfolio Sharpe 1.32→1.41 and OOS
0.90→1.06 while cutting DD to 11.5%. **But be skeptical:** the overlay is a ~zero-mean stream
(standalone Sharpe 0.04). The benefit is almost entirely **variance reduction from the negative
correlation, not added alpha** — and it COSTS return (CAGR 16%→13%). With a true-zero-edge
diversifier this Sharpe bump is fragile (it leans on the 0.32 correlation persisting OOS, and the
OOS sample is one 2022-24 crypto cycle). I would NOT deploy capital on a standalone-losing sleeve
to chase a 0.09 Sharpe point that is really de-risking.
## Fee sweep (12h portfolio Sharpe)
baseline 1.37→1.18, z-score 1.38→1.24, MACD 1.52→1.45 (lowest turnover), blend 1.43→1.22,
reversal-24m 0.07→−0.02 (0.00→0.40% RT). All trend formulations survive realistic fees; reversal
has no positive margin to survive on.
## VERDICT (honest)
- **Is there a momentum formulation that beats the 1-3-6m sign-blend? No — not OOS, not on both
assets.** MACD/acceleration look better in-sample but decay OOS (overfit + higher DD). The only
honest refinement is **continuous z-score momentum**, which matches the Sharpe with materially
lower drawdown (8.4% vs 13.3%) — a smoother variant of the SAME edge, not a new one (corr 0.96).
- **Does long-horizon reversal give an uncorrelated positive overlay? No, not a real one.** It is
uncorrelated/negatively-correlated (good) but **not positive** standalone (it loses, or at best is
flat at 24m and fails the both-assets bar). The combined-Sharpe lift (→1.41) is variance reduction
from a near-zero-mean stream and sacrifices CAGR — fragile, not bankable alpha.
- **The ~1.3 structural Sharpe ceiling on BTC/ETH-only holds.** TP01 remains the deployable winner.
If anything, swap the sign-blend for the **z-score continuous score** (or the `mom 0.5·rev`
brake) for a lower-DD profile at equal Sharpe — a risk-management tweak, not a return upgrade.
@@ -0,0 +1,187 @@
"""VERIFICA SLEEVE OPZIONI su QUOTE REALI Deribit — quanto Sharpe sopravvive a bid/ask + skew.
Lo sleeve income della strategia esterna `crypto_backtest` (vendita di put settimanali CSP su
BTC, delta 0.28) e' backtestato su prezzi MODELLATI: Black-Scholes prezzato con DVOL = IV ATM, e
si incassa il premio "fair" (mid). Due gap reali NON catturati:
(1) BID/ASK: vendendo si incassa il BID, non il mid.
(2) SKEW: una put OTM (delta 0.28) ha IV piu' alta della ATM (DVOL) -> il modello prezza la put
con la vol sbagliata.
Questo script:
PARTE 1 (rete, Deribit mainnet pubblico): scarica la catena REALE della scadenza ~settimanale,
trova la put a delta ~0.28, e misura:
- premio reale incassabile (BID, in USD) vs premio modellato (BS @ IV ATM)
- skew: IV della put OTM (mark) vs IV ATM (mark)
- spread: bid/mark
- HAIRCUT netto f = premio_bid_reale / premio_BS@ATM
PARTE 2 (locale): ri-esegue lo sleeve CSP settimanale (dati + modulo del progetto esterno) con
il premio moltiplicato per f -> Sharpe/CAGR/maxDD reali stimati, vs i modellati.
NB ONESTO: e' UNO SNAPSHOT (la catena di oggi). Lo spread si allarga nello stress; lo skew varia.
Va ripetuto nel tempo per robustezza. Ma misura direttamente i due gap col mercato vero.
uv run python scripts/research/options_real_quote_check.py
"""
from __future__ import annotations
import sys
from pathlib import Path
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
EXT = Path("/home/adriano/crypto_backtest")
sys.path.insert(0, str(EXT))
PUT_DELTA = 0.28
CYCLE_DAYS = 7
ANN = 365
def fetch_real_chain():
import ccxt
ex = ccxt.deribit({"enableRateLimit": True})
ex.load_markets()
puts = [m for m in ex.markets.values()
if m.get("option") and m["base"] == "BTC" and m["optionType"] == "put"]
calls = [m for m in ex.markets.values()
if m.get("option") and m["base"] == "BTC" and m["optionType"] == "call"]
# expiries -> pick the one closest to CYCLE_DAYS days out
now = pd.Timestamp.utcnow().tz_localize(None)
def exp_dt(m):
return pd.to_datetime(m["symbol"].split("-")[1], format="%y%m%d")
exps = sorted(set(exp_dt(m) for m in puts))
target = now + pd.Timedelta(days=CYCLE_DAYS)
expiry = min(exps, key=lambda e: abs((e - target).days))
dte = (expiry - now).days + (expiry - now).seconds / 86400
chain_puts = [m for m in puts if exp_dt(m) == expiry]
chain_calls = [m for m in calls if exp_dt(m) == expiry]
print(f" scadenza scelta: {expiry.date()} (DTE ~{dte:.1f}g, target {CYCLE_DAYS}g) "
f"strikes put: {len(chain_puts)}")
def tick(m):
try:
t = ex.fetch_ticker(m["symbol"])
i = t["info"]
g = i.get("greeks") or {}
return dict(symbol=m["symbol"], strike=float(m["strike"]),
delta=float(g.get("delta", "nan")), mark_iv=float(i.get("mark_iv", "nan")),
bid=float(i.get("best_bid_price") or 0), ask=float(i.get("best_ask_price") or 0),
mark=float(i.get("mark_price") or 0),
S=float(i.get("underlying_price") or i.get("index_price") or 0))
except Exception:
return None
rows = [r for r in (tick(m) for m in chain_puts) if r and np.isfinite(r["delta"])]
callrows = [r for r in (tick(m) for m in chain_calls) if r and np.isfinite(r["delta"])]
return expiry, dte, pd.DataFrame(rows), pd.DataFrame(callrows)
def bs_put(S, K, T, sigma):
from scipy.stats import norm
if T <= 0 or sigma <= 0:
return max(0.0, K - S)
d1 = (np.log(S / K) + 0.5 * sigma ** 2 * T) / (sigma * np.sqrt(T))
d2 = d1 - sigma * np.sqrt(T)
return K * norm.cdf(-d2) - S * norm.cdf(-d1)
def measure_haircut(dte, puts, calls):
S = puts["S"].iloc[0]
T = dte / ANN
# ATM IV: option with |delta| closest to 0.5 (use calls+puts mark_iv near ATM)
allo = pd.concat([puts.assign(typ="P"), calls.assign(typ="C")], ignore_index=True)
atm = allo.iloc[(allo["delta"].abs() - 0.5).abs().argsort()[:4]]
atm_iv = atm["mark_iv"].mean() / 100.0
# delta-0.28 put (delta negative)
p = puts.iloc[(puts["delta"] - (-PUT_DELTA)).abs().argsort()[:1]].iloc[0]
K = p["strike"]
put_iv = p["mark_iv"] / 100.0
# premiums in USD (Deribit option price is in BTC)
bid_usd = p["bid"] * S
mark_usd = p["mark"] * S
ask_usd = p["ask"] * S
bs_atm_usd = bs_put(S, K, T, atm_iv) # cio' che il backtest assume (DVOL=ATM, incassa mid)
bs_skew_usd = bs_put(S, K, T, put_iv) # BS alla vol REALE della put (isola lo skew)
print("\n --- MISURA SU QUOTE REALI (snapshot) ---")
print(f" underlying S = {S:,.0f} strike(delta~-0.28) K = {K:,.0f} ({(1-K/S)*100:.1f}% OTM) delta {p['delta']:.3f}")
print(f" IV ATM (DVOL-equivalente) = {atm_iv*100:.1f}% IV put OTM (mark) = {put_iv*100:.1f}% "
f"skew +{(put_iv-atm_iv)*100:.1f} pt")
print(f" premio put (USD): BID {bid_usd:,.1f} mark {mark_usd:,.1f} ask {ask_usd:,.1f}")
print(f" spread bid/mark = {(p['bid']/p['mark']) if p['mark']>0 else float('nan'):.3f} "
f"(ask-bid)/mark = {((p['ask']-p['bid'])/p['mark']) if p['mark']>0 else float('nan'):.3f}")
print(f" modellato dal backtest BS@IV-ATM = {bs_atm_usd:,.1f} USD (BS@IV-put-reale = {bs_skew_usd:,.1f})")
f_bid = bid_usd / bs_atm_usd if bs_atm_usd > 0 else float("nan")
f_mark = mark_usd / bs_atm_usd if bs_atm_usd > 0 else float("nan")
print(f" HAIRCUT premio: reale(BID)/modello = {f_bid:.3f} | mark/modello = {f_mark:.3f}")
print(f" -> lo skew ALZA il premio lordo (+{(bs_skew_usd/bs_atm_usd-1)*100:.0f}% vs ATM), ma il "
f"BID/ask lo riporta a {f_bid*100:.0f}% del modello.")
return f_bid
def csp_sleeve_haircut(f):
"""Ri-esegue lo sleeve CSP settimanale (dati+modulo esterni) con premio * f."""
import options_deribit as od
px = pd.read_csv(EXT / "data/BTCUSDT.csv", parse_dates=["date"]).set_index("date")["close"]
dvol = pd.read_csv(EXT / "data/DVOL_BTC.csv", parse_dates=["date"]).set_index("date")["close"]
iv = od.build_iv(px, "BTC", dvol)
d0 = dvol.index[0]
px, iv = px[px.index >= d0], iv[iv.index >= d0]
def sim(prem_mult, m=0.63):
idx = px.index
locs = list(range(0, len(idx) - CYCLE_DAYS, CYCLE_DAYS))
T = CYCLE_DAYS / ANN
rows = []
for i in locs:
S0, S1, sig = px.iloc[i], px.iloc[i + CYCLE_DAYS], iv.iloc[i]
if not (np.isfinite(S0) and np.isfinite(S1) and np.isfinite(sig)):
continue
Kp = od.strike_for_delta(S0, T, sig, PUT_DELTA, call=False)
pp = od.bs_price(S0, Kp, T, sig, call=False) * prem_mult # <-- haircut sul premio
fee = od.option_fee(S0, pp) + (od.SETTLE_FEE * S0 if S1 < Kp else 0)
pnl = pp - max(Kp - S1, 0.0) - fee
rows.append((idx[i + CYCLE_DAYS], m * pnl / S0))
s = pd.Series({d: r for d, r in rows}).sort_index()
return s
def met(s, name):
eq = (1 + s).cumprod()
cpy = ANN / CYCLE_DAYS
yrs = len(s) / cpy
cagr = eq.iloc[-1] ** (1 / yrs) - 1 if eq.iloc[-1] > 0 else -1
sh = s.mean() / s.std() * np.sqrt(cpy)
dd = (eq / eq.cummax() - 1).min()
print(f" {name:<34s} CAGR {cagr*100:>+6.1f}% Sharpe {sh:>5.2f} maxDD {dd*100:>6.1f}% win {(s>0).mean()*100:>3.0f}%")
return sh
print("\n --- RI-ESECUZIONE SLEEVE CSP con HAIRCUT REALE (m=0.63, hold-to-expiry) ---")
print(f" finestra {px.index[0].date()} -> {px.index[-1].date()} (DVOL reale)")
sh_model = met(sim(1.00), "modello (premio pieno, BS@DVOL)")
sh_real = met(sim(f), f"reale stimato (premio x{f:.2f} = BID)")
# sensitivity
for ff in (0.85, 0.70, 0.55):
met(sim(ff), f"sensitivity premio x{ff:.2f}")
print(f"\n => con haircut reale f={f:.2f}: Sharpe sleeve {sh_model:.2f} -> {sh_real:.2f}")
return sh_model, sh_real
def main():
print("=" * 92)
print("# VERIFICA SLEEVE OPZIONI su QUOTE REALI DERIBIT — quanto Sharpe sopravvive")
print("=" * 92)
try:
expiry, dte, puts, calls = fetch_real_chain()
f = measure_haircut(dte, puts, calls)
except Exception as e:
print(f" [rete] impossibile scaricare la catena reale ({type(e).__name__}: {e})")
print(" uso haircut di letteratura f=0.70 (spread+skew tipici su put OTM settimanali)")
f = 0.70
f = float(np.clip(f, 0.3, 1.2))
csp_sleeve_haircut(f)
print("\n CAVEAT: snapshot singolo; spread peggiora nello stress; ripetere nel tempo + testnet.")
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
+118
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,118 @@
"""ADVERSARIAL LOOK-AHEAD / EXECUTION-LAG AUDIT of the trend portfolio across timeframes.
Motivation (2026-06-19): a look-ahead bug (ffill mixed-timeframe on open-labeled bars) can
inflate sub-daily Sharpe (e.g. 4h to ~1.6 vs a real ~1.1). This audit stress-tests OUR pipeline:
1. EXECUTION LAG: standard book holds the position decided at close[i] during bar i+1.
We re-run with an EXTRA bar of delay (held during i+2) — i.e. you cannot trade exactly at
the close; there is one bar of slippage/latency. A genuine slow-trend edge barely moves; a
timing artifact collapses. We sweep lag = 1 (standard) and 2 (conservative).
2. RELABEL TEST: resample with label='left' (open-labeled, our default) vs label='right'
(close-labeled). The realized Sharpe must be (near) identical; a large gap => the labeling
leaks information.
Conclusion target: identify the timeframe below which costs + lag dominate (don't deploy there).
Run: uv run python scripts/research/trackD_lookahead_audit.py
"""
from __future__ import annotations
import sys
from pathlib import Path
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
sys.path.insert(0, str(Path(__file__).resolve().parents[2]))
from src.backtest.harness import load
from src.strategies.trend_portfolio import simple_returns, realized_vol, tsmom_blend
ASSETS = ["BTC", "ETH"]
FEE_SIDE = 0.0005
TARGET_VOL = 0.20
LEVERAGE = 2.0
LONG_ONLY = True
TFS = {"4h": ("4h", 6), "6h": ("6h", 4), "8h": ("8h", 3), "12h": ("12h", 2), "1d": ("1D", 1)}
def resample(df1h: pd.DataFrame, rule: str, label: str) -> pd.DataFrame:
g = df1h.copy()
idx = pd.to_datetime(g["timestamp"], unit="ms", utc=True)
idx.name = "dt"
g.index = idx
out = g.resample(rule, label=label, closed="left").agg(
{"open": "first", "high": "max", "low": "min", "close": "last", "volume": "sum"})
out = out.dropna(subset=["open"])
out["datetime"] = out.index
return out.reset_index(drop=True)
def target_series(c, bpd):
bpy = bpd * 365.25
r = simple_returns(c)
vol = realized_vol(r, 30 * bpd, bpy)
direction = np.clip(tsmom_blend(c, (30 * bpd, 90 * bpd, 180 * bpd)), 0, None) if LONG_ONLY \
else tsmom_blend(c, (30 * bpd, 90 * bpd, 180 * bpd))
scal = np.where((vol > 0) & np.isfinite(vol), TARGET_VOL / vol, 0.0)
tgt = np.clip(direction * scal, -LEVERAGE, LEVERAGE)
tgt[~np.isfinite(tgt)] = 0.0
return tgt, r
def sleeve_net(df, bpd, lag):
"""net[t] uses position decided at close[t-lag] (lag>=1). lag=1 = standard, lag=2 = +1 delay."""
c = df["close"].values.astype(float)
tgt, r = target_series(c, bpd)
pos = np.zeros(len(tgt))
pos[lag:] = tgt[:-lag]
gross = pos * r
turn = np.abs(np.diff(pos, prepend=0.0))
net = gross - FEE_SIDE * turn
net[:lag] = 0.0
return np.clip(net, -0.99, None), pd.to_datetime(df["datetime"])
def portfolio_metrics(dfs, bpd, lag):
series = {}
for a in ASSETS:
net, ts = sleeve_net(dfs[a], bpd, lag)
series[a] = pd.Series(net, index=pd.to_datetime(ts.values))
J = pd.concat(series, axis=1, join="inner").dropna()
combo = 0.5 * J["BTC"].values + 0.5 * J["ETH"].values
bpy = bpd * 365.25
sh = float(np.mean(combo) / np.std(combo) * np.sqrt(bpy)) if np.std(combo) > 0 else 0.0
eq = np.cumprod(1.0 + np.clip(combo, -0.99, None))
dd = float(np.max((np.maximum.accumulate(eq) - eq) / np.maximum.accumulate(eq)))
yrs = (J.index[-1] - J.index[0]).days / 365.25
cagr = eq[-1] ** (1 / yrs) - 1
return sh, dd, cagr
def main():
raw = {a: load(a, "1h") for a in ASSETS}
print("=" * 96)
print("# LOOK-AHEAD / EXECUTION-LAG AUDIT — trend portfolio (long-flat, tvol20, lev2), per timeframe")
print("# lag1 = standard (decision held next bar). lag2 = +1 bar execution delay (conservative).")
print("# left/right = resample label (open vs close). Big gap => labeling leak.")
print("=" * 96)
print(f" {'TF':<5s}{'Sh lag1(L)':>12s}{'Sh lag2(L)':>12s}{'Sh lag1(R)':>12s}"
f"{'CAGR l1':>10s}{'CAGR l2':>10s}{'DD l1':>8s}{'lag-decay':>11s}")
for tf, (rule, bpd) in TFS.items():
dfsL = {a: resample(raw[a], rule, "left") for a in ASSETS}
dfsR = {a: resample(raw[a], rule, "right") for a in ASSETS}
sh1L, dd1, cagr1 = portfolio_metrics(dfsL, bpd, 1)
sh2L, _, cagr2 = portfolio_metrics(dfsL, bpd, 2)
sh1R, _, _ = portfolio_metrics(dfsR, bpd, 1)
decay = (sh1L - sh2L) / sh1L * 100 if sh1L else 0.0
flag = " <-- robust" if sh2L >= 0.9 * sh1L and abs(sh1L - sh1R) < 0.1 else ""
print(f" {tf:<5s}{sh1L:>12.2f}{sh2L:>12.2f}{sh1R:>12.2f}"
f"{cagr1*100:>+9.1f}%{cagr2*100:>+9.1f}%{dd1*100:>7.1f}%{decay:>+10.0f}%{flag}")
print("\n Interpretation:")
print(" - If Sh lag2 << Sh lag1 (big lag-decay), the edge needs to trade AT the close -> sub-TF")
print(" timing artifact / cost-fragile. Robust slow-trend should barely move with +1 bar.")
print(" - If Sh lag1(left) != Sh lag1(right), the bar LABELING leaks -> look-ahead. Should match.")
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
+365
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,365 @@
"""TRACK F — CALENDAR SEASONALITY on BTC & ETH (hour-of-day, day-of-week, interactions).
Honest test of whether there is a SYSTEMATIC, TRADEABLE calendar edge on the certified
Deribit-mainnet BTC/ETH feeds. Seasonality is the easiest place on earth to overfit
(24 hours x 7 weekdays = 168 buckets => you WILL find "significant" cells by chance), so
every claim here is held to the project's anti-look-ahead, OOS, per-year, both-assets bar.
METHODOLOGY (no shortcuts):
- ret[i] = close[i]/close[i-1]-1 is known at close[i]. A position decided at close[i]
earns ret[i+1]. We NEVER include the bar being traded (or any future bar) in the
statistic that decides the trade.
- DESCRIPTIVE tables (per-hour / per-weekday mean returns) are split IS(65%)/OOS(35%).
They are diagnostics, not trades.
- TRADEABLE rule = ADAPTIVE EXPANDING sign: at close[i] we look up the calendar bucket
of bar i+1 (the clock is known with zero look-ahead) and take the SIGN of that bucket's
mean return computed ONLY on bars <= i (expanding, warmup-gated). Long-flat or
long-short. Fees charged only on |Δposition| (turnover-aware). This lets the data pick
each bucket's sign LIVE — the honest analogue of "trade the seasonal".
- Also an in-sample-optimised discrete rule (enter at hour H, hold W bars, best dir) is
shown ONLY to demonstrate the overfit gap IS->OOS.
- NET fees fee_side baseline 0.0005 (=0.10% RT); swept 0.0005/0.00075/0.001.
- A survivor must be net-positive OOS AND across years AND on BOTH BTC & ETH.
Run: uv run python scripts/research/trackF_seasonality.py
"""
from __future__ import annotations
import sys
from pathlib import Path
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
sys.path.insert(0, str(Path(__file__).resolve().parents[2]))
from src.backtest.harness import load # noqa: E402
ASSETS = ["BTC", "ETH"]
TF = "1h"
FEE_SIDE = 0.0005 # 0.05%/side = 0.10% round-trip
BARS_PER_DAY = 24
BPY = BARS_PER_DAY * 365.25
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# helpers
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
def prep(asset: str, tf: str = TF):
df = load(asset, tf)
c = df["close"].values.astype(float)
ret = np.empty(len(c))
ret[0] = 0.0
ret[1:] = c[1:] / c[:-1] - 1.0
dt = pd.to_datetime(df["datetime"])
return dict(
df=df, ret=ret,
hour=dt.dt.hour.values.astype(int),
dow=dt.dt.dayofweek.values.astype(int), # 0=Mon..6=Sun
ts=dt,
)
def metrics_from_pnl(pnl: np.ndarray, ts: pd.Series):
"""pnl[i] = realized per-bar net return of the strategy (already fee-adjusted)."""
eq = np.cumprod(1.0 + np.clip(pnl, -0.99, None))
r = pnl[np.isfinite(pnl)]
sharpe = float(np.mean(r) / np.std(r) * np.sqrt(BPY)) if np.std(r) > 0 else 0.0
peak = np.maximum.accumulate(eq)
maxdd = float(np.max((peak - eq) / peak)) if len(eq) else 0.0
span_days = (ts.iloc[-1] - ts.iloc[0]).total_seconds() / 86400
years = span_days / 365.25 if span_days > 0 else 1.0
total = eq[-1] / eq[0] if len(eq) else 1.0
cagr = total ** (1 / years) - 1 if years > 0 and total > 0 else -1.0
daily_2k = (2000 * total - 2000) / span_days if span_days > 0 else 0.0
return dict(sharpe=sharpe, maxdd=maxdd, cagr=cagr, total=total - 1.0,
daily_2k=daily_2k, eq=eq)
def per_year_pnl(pnl: np.ndarray, ts: pd.Series):
s = pd.Series(pnl, index=ts.values)
out = {}
for y, g in s.groupby(s.index.year):
eq = np.cumprod(1.0 + np.clip(g.values, -0.99, None))
out[int(y)] = float(eq[-1] - 1.0)
return out
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# 1. DESCRIPTIVE seasonality tables (diagnostics, IS vs OOS)
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
def descriptive(data, frac=0.65):
n = len(data["ret"])
cut = int(n * frac)
ret, hour, dow = data["ret"], data["hour"], data["dow"]
rows_h, rows_d = {}, {}
for h in range(24):
m_is = ret[:cut][hour[:cut] == h]
m_oos = ret[cut:][hour[cut:] == h]
rows_h[h] = (m_is.mean() * 1e4, m_oos.mean() * 1e4,
np.sign(m_is.mean()) == np.sign(m_oos.mean()))
for d in range(7):
m_is = ret[:cut][dow[:cut] == d]
m_oos = ret[cut:][dow[cut:] == d]
rows_d[d] = (m_is.mean() * 1e4, m_oos.mean() * 1e4,
np.sign(m_is.mean()) == np.sign(m_oos.mean()))
return rows_h, rows_d
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# 2. ADAPTIVE EXPANDING-sign seasonal strategy (the honest tradeable test)
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
def adaptive_seasonal(data, bucket="hour", mode="longshort",
warmup=200, fee_side=FEE_SIDE):
"""Position at close[i] = sign of the EXPANDING past mean return of bar (i+1)'s
calendar bucket, using only bars <= i. earns ret[i+1]. Fee on |Δposition|."""
ret = data["ret"]
key = data[bucket]
n = len(ret)
nbuck = int(key.max()) + 1
sums = np.zeros(nbuck)
counts = np.zeros(nbuck)
pos = np.zeros(n)
for i in range(1, n - 1):
b = key[i]
sums[b] += ret[i]
counts[b] += 1
nb = key[i + 1]
if counts[nb] >= warmup:
m = sums[nb] / counts[nb]
if m > 0:
pos[i] = 1.0
else:
pos[i] = -1.0 if mode == "longshort" else 0.0
# pnl[i] earned over bar i+1
pnl = np.zeros(n)
prev = 0.0
for i in range(1, n - 1):
turn = abs(pos[i] - prev)
pnl[i] = pos[i] * ret[i + 1] - fee_side * turn
prev = pos[i]
return pnl, pos
def adaptive_hourxdow(data, mode="longshort", warmup=120, fee_side=FEE_SIDE):
ret, hour, dow = data["ret"], data["hour"], data["dow"]
key = hour * 7 + dow # 168 buckets
n = len(ret)
sums = np.zeros(168)
counts = np.zeros(168)
pos = np.zeros(n)
for i in range(1, n - 1):
b = key[i]
sums[b] += ret[i]
counts[b] += 1
nb = key[i + 1]
if counts[nb] >= warmup:
m = sums[nb] / counts[nb]
if m > 0:
pos[i] = 1.0
else:
pos[i] = -1.0 if mode == "longshort" else 0.0
pnl = np.zeros(n)
prev = 0.0
for i in range(1, n - 1):
turn = abs(pos[i] - prev)
pnl[i] = pos[i] * ret[i + 1] - fee_side * turn
prev = pos[i]
return pnl, pos
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# 3. In-sample-optimised DISCRETE rule (to expose the overfit gap)
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
def discrete_hour_rule_scan(data, frac=0.65, fee_side=FEE_SIDE):
"""Scan IS for best (entry_hour, hold_window, direction) by IS Sharpe; report OOS.
A trade: enter at close of bar whose hour==H (decided with data<=close[i]), hold W
bars, exit at close. One trade per day. Fee charged round-trip on each trade.
"""
ret, hour, ts = data["ret"], data["hour"], data["ts"]
n = len(ret)
cut = int(n * frac)
def rule_pnl(H, W, direction, lo, hi):
pnl = np.zeros(n)
i = lo
last_exit = lo - 1
while i < hi:
if hour[i] == H and i > last_exit:
# cumulative return over the next W bars: prod(1+ret[i+1..i+W]) - 1
end = min(i + W, n - 1)
gross = np.prod(1.0 + ret[i + 1:end + 1]) - 1.0
pnl[i] = direction * gross - 2 * fee_side
last_exit = end
i = end
else:
i += 1
return pnl
best = None
n_tested = 0
for H in range(24):
for W in (1, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 12, 24):
for direction in (+1, -1):
n_tested += 1
pnl_is = rule_pnl(H, W, direction, 1, cut)
r = pnl_is[pnl_is != 0.0]
if len(r) < 50:
continue
sh = np.mean(r) / np.std(r) * np.sqrt(BPY) if np.std(r) > 0 else 0.0
if best is None or sh > best[0]:
best = (sh, H, W, direction)
sh, H, W, direction = best
pnl_oos = rule_pnl(H, W, direction, cut, n)
r_oos = pnl_oos[pnl_oos != 0.0]
sh_oos = (np.mean(r_oos) / np.std(r_oos) * np.sqrt(BPY)) if (len(r_oos) and np.std(r_oos) > 0) else 0.0
return dict(n_tested=n_tested, H=H, W=W, dir=direction, sh_is=sh,
sh_oos=sh_oos, n_is=int((rule_pnl(H, W, direction, 1, cut) != 0).sum()),
n_oos=len(r_oos), oos_mean_bp=r_oos.mean() * 1e4 if len(r_oos) else 0.0)
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# reporting
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
def split_metrics(pnl, ts, frac=0.65):
n = len(pnl)
cut = int(n * frac)
m_is = metrics_from_pnl(pnl[:cut], ts.iloc[:cut])
m_oos = metrics_from_pnl(pnl[cut:], ts.iloc[cut:])
m_all = metrics_from_pnl(pnl, ts)
return m_is, m_oos, m_all
def turnover_per_year(pos, ts):
s = pd.Series(np.abs(np.diff(pos, prepend=0.0)), index=ts.values)
return s.groupby(s.index.year).sum().to_dict()
def main():
print("=" * 100)
print("# TRACK F — CALENDAR SEASONALITY (hour-of-day / day-of-week / hour×weekday)")
print("# certified Deribit-mainnet BTC & ETH, 1h UTC. fee_side=0.0005 (0.10% RT).")
print("# No look-ahead: bucket stats use only bars <= i; position earns ret[i+1].")
print("=" * 100)
data = {a: prep(a) for a in ASSETS}
# --- DESCRIPTIVE ---------------------------------------------------------
print("\n" + "#" * 100)
print("# 1. DESCRIPTIVE per-bucket mean returns (basis points/bar). IS=first 65%, OOS=last 35%.")
print("# 'sign?' = IS and OOS agree on sign. Diagnostics only (NOT trades, no fees).")
print("#" * 100)
for a in ASSETS:
rows_h, rows_d = descriptive(data[a])
print(f"\n ── {a} HOUR-OF-DAY (UTC) mean bp/hr ─────────────────────────────")
print(" hr : IS_bp OOS_bp sign?")
agree_h = 0
for h in range(24):
iv, ov, ag = rows_h[h]
agree_h += int(ag)
flag = " <-- US open" if h in (13, 14) else (" <-- US close" if h in (20, 21) else "")
print(f" {h:>2d} : {iv:>+6.2f} {ov:>+6.2f} {'Y' if ag else '.'}{flag}")
print(f" hour sign-agreement IS/OOS: {agree_h}/24")
print(f"\n ── {a} DAY-OF-WEEK mean bp/bar (0=Mon..6=Sun) ──────────────────")
names = ["Mon", "Tue", "Wed", "Thu", "Fri", "Sat", "Sun"]
agree_d = 0
for d in range(7):
iv, ov, ag = rows_d[d]
agree_d += int(ag)
print(f" {names[d]} : {iv:>+6.3f} {ov:>+6.3f} {'Y' if ag else '.'}")
print(f" weekday sign-agreement IS/OOS: {agree_d}/7")
# --- ADAPTIVE EXPANDING-SIGN (the honest tradeable test) ----------------
print("\n" + "#" * 100)
print("# 2. ADAPTIVE EXPANDING-SIGN seasonal strategies (HONEST tradeable test).")
print("# sign of bucket's PAST-ONLY mean decides position; fee on turnover.")
print("#" * 100)
configs = [
("HOUR long-short", "hour", "longshort", 200),
("HOUR long-flat ", "hour", "longflat", 200),
("DOW long-short", "dow", "longshort", 60),
("DOW long-flat ", "dow", "longflat", 60),
]
for label, bucket, mode, warmup in configs:
print(f"\n ── {label} ────────────────────────────────────────────────────")
for a in ASSETS:
pnl, pos = adaptive_seasonal(data[a], bucket=bucket, mode=mode, warmup=warmup)
ts = data[a]["ts"]
m_is, m_oos, m_all = split_metrics(pnl, ts)
py = per_year_pnl(pnl, ts)
yrs = "".join(f"{py.get(y, float('nan'))*100:>+6.0f}" for y in range(2019, 2027))
print(f" {a}: ALL Sh={m_all['sharpe']:>+5.2f} CAGR={m_all['cagr']*100:>+6.1f}% "
f"DD={m_all['maxdd']*100:>4.1f}% €/d={m_all['daily_2k']:>+5.2f} | "
f"IS Sh={m_is['sharpe']:>+5.2f} OOS Sh={m_oos['sharpe']:>+5.2f}")
print(f" per-year %: {yrs} (2019..2026)")
# buy-and-hold benchmark — the key control: does any 'seasonal' beat just being long?
print(f"\n ── BUY-AND-HOLD benchmark (the control for long-bias) ──")
for a in ASSETS:
ret = data[a]["ret"].copy()
ret[0] = 0.0
m = metrics_from_pnl(ret, data[a]["ts"])
print(f" {a}: Sh={m['sharpe']:>+5.2f} CAGR={m['cagr']*100:>+6.1f}% DD={m['maxdd']*100:>4.1f}% "
f" <- compare to DOW long-flat above (it's nearly identical = no edge, just long)")
# hour x weekday interaction (168 buckets — extreme overfit risk)
print(f"\n ── HOUR×WEEKDAY long-short (168 buckets, warmup 120) — overfit canary ──")
for a in ASSETS:
pnl, pos = adaptive_hourxdow(data[a], mode="longshort", warmup=120)
ts = data[a]["ts"]
m_is, m_oos, m_all = split_metrics(pnl, ts)
print(f" {a}: ALL Sh={m_all['sharpe']:>+5.2f} CAGR={m_all['cagr']*100:>+6.1f}% "
f"DD={m_all['maxdd']*100:>4.1f}% | IS Sh={m_is['sharpe']:>+5.2f} OOS Sh={m_oos['sharpe']:>+5.2f}")
# --- FEE SWEEP on the best adaptive config -------------------------------
print("\n" + "#" * 100)
print("# 3. FEE SWEEP — HOUR long-short adaptive (turnover-aware). Are survivors fee-robust?")
print("#" * 100)
for fee in (0.0, 0.0005, 0.00075, 0.001):
line = f" fee_side={fee:.5f} (RT {fee*2*100:.2f}%): "
for a in ASSETS:
pnl, _ = adaptive_seasonal(data[a], bucket="hour", mode="longshort",
warmup=200, fee_side=fee)
m = metrics_from_pnl(pnl, data[a]["ts"])
line += f"{a} Sh={m['sharpe']:>+5.2f} CAGR={m['cagr']*100:>+6.1f}% "
print(line)
# --- TURNOVER (fees are first-order for hour strategies) -----------------
print("\n" + "#" * 100)
print("# 4. TURNOVER (HOUR long-short adaptive): position flips/year (each flip costs ~fee).")
print("#" * 100)
for a in ASSETS:
_, pos = adaptive_seasonal(data[a], bucket="hour", mode="longshort", warmup=200)
tpy = turnover_per_year(pos, data[a]["ts"])
s = " ".join(f"{y}:{int(v)}" for y, v in sorted(tpy.items()))
print(f" {a} turnover units/yr: {s}")
# --- IN-SAMPLE-OPTIMISED DISCRETE RULE (overfit demonstration) ----------
print("\n" + "#" * 100)
print("# 5. IN-SAMPLE-OPTIMISED discrete rule (enter hour H, hold W, best dir).")
print("# Picked by IS Sharpe, reported OOS. Demonstrates the multiple-testing trap.")
print("#" * 100)
for a in ASSETS:
r = discrete_hour_rule_scan(data[a])
print(f" {a}: tested {r['n_tested']} (H,W,dir) cells -> best IS "
f"H={r['H']:02d} hold={r['W']}h dir={r['dir']:+d} "
f"IS Sh={r['sh_is']:>+5.2f} (n={r['n_is']}) -> OOS Sh={r['sh_oos']:>+5.2f} "
f"(n={r['n_oos']}, mean {r['oos_mean_bp']:>+.1f} bp/trade)")
# --- VERDICT -------------------------------------------------------------
print("\n" + "#" * 100)
print("# MULTIPLE-TESTING CAVEAT")
print("#" * 100)
print("""
Buckets examined: 24 hours + 7 weekdays + 168 hour×weekday = 199 calendar cells PER ASSET,
each tested IS and OOS, plus discrete grid = 24×8×2 = 384 (H,W,dir) cells per asset.
With that many cells, spurious 'significant' buckets are GUARANTEED. The honest filters
applied here: (a) adaptive sign chosen live on PAST data only (no cherry-picking),
(b) must hold OOS, (c) must hold per-year, (d) must hold on BOTH BTC AND ETH.
Read the IS->OOS Sharpe collapse and the per-year sign flips above as the real verdict.
""")
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
+478
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,478 @@
"""TRACK G — PRIOR-PERIOD LEVEL BREAKOUTS / RANGE on CLEAN BTC/ETH (Deribit mainnet).
HONEST harness only. We test rules defined RELATIVE TO A PRIOR CALENDAR PERIOD:
* prior-DAY high/low breakout (continuation AND fade)
* opening-range breakout (first N UTC hours -> break for rest of day)
* prior-day CLOSE / gap / range-position / prior-day return-sign filter
* prior-WEEK high/low breakout
* time-anchored entries (act at a given UTC hour vs prior-day level), exit EOD/fixed/TP-SL
The single question: on clean BTC/ETH, with a genuinely EXECUTABLE entry (direction and
price decided with data <= close[i], fill at close[i], NEVER entering at the exact level
intrabar), net of realistic Deribit fees, OOS and grid-robust on BOTH assets —
do prior-period breakouts CONTINUE (trend) or REVERT (fade)? Is there a deployable edge?
NO LOOK-AHEAD GUARANTEES:
* Prior-period levels are built by aggregating to daily/weekly bars and SHIFTING by one
full period (shift(1) on the closed-period frame). 'Today'/'this-week' is NEVER part of
the level. The prior period is fully closed before any bar of the current period.
* Opening-range levels are used ONLY on bars AFTER the open window has fully closed.
* Direction + price decided at close[i]; fill at close[i] (harness enforces).
Run:
uv run python scripts/research/trackG_prior_levels.py # full
uv run python scripts/research/trackG_prior_levels.py --quick # 1h only, fewer grids
"""
from __future__ import annotations
import argparse
import sys
import time
from itertools import product
from pathlib import Path
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
sys.path.insert(0, str(Path(__file__).resolve().parents[2]))
from src.backtest.harness import load, backtest_signals, oos_split
# ===========================================================================
# Causal helpers
# ===========================================================================
def atr(df: pd.DataFrame, period: int = 14) -> np.ndarray:
h, l, c = df["high"].values, df["low"].values, df["close"].values
pc = np.roll(c, 1)
pc[0] = c[0]
tr = np.maximum(h - l, np.maximum(np.abs(h - pc), np.abs(l - pc)))
return pd.Series(tr).ewm(alpha=1.0 / period, adjust=False).mean().values
def prior_period_levels(df: pd.DataFrame, period: str = "D") -> dict:
"""Return prior-period high/low/close/open/range arrays aligned to each intraday bar.
period='D': prior calendar day (UTC). period='W': prior ISO week (anchored Mon 00:00 UTC).
Uses shift(1) on the CLOSED-period frame: the level for the current period only sees the
fully-closed previous period -> no look-ahead.
"""
dt = df["datetime"]
if period == "D":
key = dt.dt.floor("D")
elif period == "W":
key = dt.dt.floor("D") - pd.to_timedelta(dt.dt.weekday, unit="D")
else:
raise ValueError(period)
key = key.reset_index(drop=True)
agg = pd.DataFrame({
"key": key,
"high": df["high"].values, "low": df["low"].values,
"close": df["close"].values, "open": df["open"].values,
})
g = agg.groupby("key").agg(high=("high", "max"), low=("low", "min"),
close=("close", "last"), open=("open", "first")).sort_index()
gp = g.shift(1) # prior, fully-closed period
km = key.map # map current-period key -> prior-period aggregate
ph = km(gp["high"]).values.astype(float)
pl = km(gp["low"]).values.astype(float)
pc = km(gp["close"]).values.astype(float)
po = km(gp["open"]).values.astype(float)
pret = (gp["close"] / gp["open"] - 1.0) # prior-period return (sign filter)
prv = key.map(pret).values.astype(float)
return {"ph": ph, "pl": pl, "pc": pc, "po": po, "prange": ph - pl, "pret": prv}
def opening_range(df: pd.DataFrame, n_open_hours: int) -> dict:
"""Opening-range high/low for the first n_open_hours of each UTC day, plus a per-bar
flag of whether the open window has CLOSED (hour >= n_open_hours)."""
dt = df["datetime"]
date = dt.dt.floor("D")
hour = dt.dt.hour
date = date.reset_index(drop=True)
in_open = (hour < n_open_hours).values
o = pd.DataFrame({"date": date, "high": df["high"].values, "low": df["low"].values})
o_open = o[in_open]
org = o_open.groupby("date").agg(orh=("high", "max"), orl=("low", "min"))
orh = date.map(org["orh"]).values.astype(float)
orl = date.map(org["orl"]).values.astype(float)
closed = (hour >= n_open_hours).values
return {"orh": orh, "orl": orl, "closed": closed}
def bars_left_in_day(df: pd.DataFrame) -> np.ndarray:
date = df["datetime"].dt.floor("D")
grp = df.groupby(date)
idx_in_day = grp.cumcount().values
size = grp["close"].transform("size").values
return (size - idx_in_day - 1).astype(int)
# ===========================================================================
# Signal generators -> list[dict|None] length len(df). Decisions use data <= close[i].
# ===========================================================================
def sig_prior_break(df, period="D", level="high", side="cont", anchor_hour=None,
exit_mode="eod", max_bars=24, tp_atr=0.0, sl_atr=0.0, atr_p=14,
buffer=0.0):
"""Prior-period level breakout.
level='high': trigger when close[i] > prior_high*(1+buffer)
level='low' : trigger when close[i] < prior_low *(1-buffer)
side='cont' : trade IN the breakout direction (high->long, low->short)
side='fade' : trade AGAINST it (high->short, low->long)
anchor_hour : if set, only evaluate on bars at that UTC hour (time-anchored)
exit_mode : 'eod' (close at end of UTC day), 'bars' (max_bars), TP/SL via *_atr.
"""
lv = prior_period_levels(df, period)
c = df["close"].values
a = atr(df, atr_p) if (tp_atr or sl_atr) else None
bl = bars_left_in_day(df) if exit_mode == "eod" else None
hour = df["datetime"].dt.hour.values
n = len(c)
out = [None] * n
ref = lv["ph"] if level == "high" else lv["pl"]
for i in range(n):
if anchor_hour is not None and hour[i] != anchor_hour:
continue
r = ref[i]
if not np.isfinite(r):
continue
px = c[i]
if level == "high":
if not (px > r * (1.0 + buffer)):
continue
brk_dir = 1
else:
if not (px < r * (1.0 - buffer)):
continue
brk_dir = -1
direction = brk_dir if side == "cont" else -brk_dir
if exit_mode == "eod":
mb = max(int(bl[i]), 1)
else:
mb = max_bars
tp = sl = None
if a is not None and np.isfinite(a[i]):
if tp_atr:
tp = px + direction * tp_atr * a[i]
if sl_atr:
sl = px - direction * sl_atr * a[i]
out[i] = {"dir": direction, "tp": tp, "sl": sl, "max_bars": mb}
return out
def sig_or_break(df, n_open_hours=6, side="cont", exit_mode="eod", max_bars=12,
tp_atr=0.0, sl_atr=0.0, atr_p=14, buffer=0.0):
"""Opening-range breakout: after the first n_open_hours close, trade a break of the
OR high (long if cont) or OR low (short if cont). Only the FIRST break per day fires
(the harness keeps the position busy until exit)."""
orr = opening_range(df, n_open_hours)
c = df["close"].values
a = atr(df, atr_p) if (tp_atr or sl_atr) else None
bl = bars_left_in_day(df) if exit_mode == "eod" else None
n = len(c)
out = [None] * n
orh, orl, closed = orr["orh"], orr["orl"], orr["closed"]
for i in range(n):
if not closed[i] or not np.isfinite(orh[i]):
continue
px = c[i]
if px > orh[i]:
brk = 1
elif px < orl[i]:
brk = -1
else:
continue
direction = brk if side == "cont" else -brk
if exit_mode == "eod":
mb = max(int(bl[i]), 1)
else:
mb = max_bars
tp = sl = None
if a is not None and np.isfinite(a[i]):
if tp_atr:
tp = px + direction * tp_atr * a[i]
if sl_atr:
sl = px - direction * sl_atr * a[i]
out[i] = {"dir": direction, "tp": tp, "sl": sl, "max_bars": mb}
return out
def sig_gap(df, side="cont", anchor_hour=0, thr=0.0, exit_mode="eod", max_bars=24,
ret_filter=0):
"""Gap vs prior-day CLOSE, evaluated at a given UTC hour (default the first bar of the
day). gap = close[i]/prior_close - 1. If gap>thr -> up-gap; gap<-thr -> down-gap.
side='cont' trades in the gap direction; 'fade' against. ret_filter: +1 only when
prior-day return positive, -1 only when negative, 0 no filter."""
lv = prior_period_levels(df, "D")
c = df["close"].values
bl = bars_left_in_day(df) if exit_mode == "eod" else None
hour = df["datetime"].dt.hour.values
pc, pret = lv["pc"], lv["pret"]
n = len(c)
out = [None] * n
for i in range(n):
if hour[i] != anchor_hour or not np.isfinite(pc[i]):
continue
gap = c[i] / pc[i] - 1.0
if gap > thr:
g = 1
elif gap < -thr:
g = -1
else:
continue
if ret_filter and np.isfinite(pret[i]):
if ret_filter > 0 and not (pret[i] > 0):
continue
if ret_filter < 0 and not (pret[i] < 0):
continue
direction = g if side == "cont" else -g
mb = max(int(bl[i]), 1) if exit_mode == "eod" else max_bars
out[i] = {"dir": direction, "tp": None, "sl": None, "max_bars": mb}
return out
# ===========================================================================
# Evaluation
# ===========================================================================
def run_split(df, sigfn, params, fee_rt=0.001, leverage=1.0, frac=0.65):
cut = oos_split(df, frac)
full = backtest_signals(df, sigfn(df, **params), fee_rt=fee_rt, leverage=leverage)
di = df.iloc[:cut].reset_index(drop=True)
do = df.iloc[cut:].reset_index(drop=True)
is_ = backtest_signals(di, sigfn(di, **params), fee_rt=fee_rt, leverage=leverage)
oos = backtest_signals(do, sigfn(do, **params), fee_rt=fee_rt, leverage=leverage)
return full, is_, oos
def hdr(t):
print("\n" + "=" * 100)
print(t)
print("=" * 100)
# ===========================================================================
# Main
# ===========================================================================
def main():
ap = argparse.ArgumentParser()
ap.add_argument("--quick", action="store_true")
args = ap.parse_args()
t0 = time.time()
assets = ["BTC", "ETH"]
tfs = ["1h"] if args.quick else ["1h", "15m"]
data = {}
hdr("DATA")
for a in assets:
for tf in tfs:
df = load(a, tf)
data[(a, tf)] = df
print(f" {a} {tf:>3s}: {len(df):>7d} bars {df['datetime'].iloc[0].date()}"
f"->{df['datetime'].iloc[-1].date()}")
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------
# PASS 1 — PRIOR-DAY BREAKOUT: continuation vs fade, any-bar (first break/day),
# EOD exit. THE core question: do prior-day breakouts continue or revert?
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------
hdr("PASS 1 — PRIOR-DAY HIGH/LOW breakout, any-bar first-break, EOD exit (1h, fee=0.001)\n"
" CONTINUATION vs FADE side-by-side. OOS net must be >0 on BOTH to matter.")
print(f" {'rule':<26s} | "
f"{'BTC IS / OOS (tr, wr, shrp)':<40s} | {'ETH IS / OOS (tr, wr, shrp)':<40s}")
for level in ["high", "low"]:
for side in ["cont", "fade"]:
name = f"PD {level:<4s} {side}"
line = f" {name:<26s} | "
for a in assets:
df = data[(a, "1h")]
_, is_, oos = run_split(df, sig_prior_break,
dict(period="D", level=level, side=side,
exit_mode="eod"))
line += (f"{is_.net_return*100:>+6.0f}/{oos.net_return*100:>+6.0f}% "
f"(t{oos.n_trades:>4d} w{oos.win_rate:>4.1f} s{oos.sharpe:>+4.1f}) | ")
print(line)
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------
# PASS 2 — OPENING-RANGE breakout (continuation vs fade), various open windows.
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------
hdr("PASS 2 — OPENING-RANGE breakout (first N UTC hours), EOD exit (1h, fee=0.001).\n"
" CONTINUATION vs FADE. Survivor = OOS>0 on BOTH assets.")
for nopen in ([6] if args.quick else [3, 6, 8, 12]):
for side in ["cont", "fade"]:
name = f"OR N={nopen:<2d} {side}"
line = f" {name:<26s} | "
for a in assets:
df = data[(a, "1h")]
_, is_, oos = run_split(df, sig_or_break,
dict(n_open_hours=nopen, side=side, exit_mode="eod"))
line += (f"{a} OOS={oos.net_return*100:>+6.0f}% "
f"(t{oos.n_trades:>4d} w{oos.win_rate:>4.1f} s{oos.sharpe:>+4.1f}) | ")
print(line)
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------
# PASS 3 — GAP vs prior close at day open (hour 0), continuation vs fade,
# with optional prior-day return-sign filter.
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------
hdr("PASS 3 — GAP vs prior-day CLOSE at hour 0, EOD exit (1h, fee=0.001).\n"
" continuation vs fade; thr = min |gap|.")
for thr in ([0.0] if args.quick else [0.0, 0.005, 0.01]):
for side in ["cont", "fade"]:
name = f"GAP thr={thr*100:.1f}% {side}"
line = f" {name:<26s} | "
for a in assets:
df = data[(a, "1h")]
_, is_, oos = run_split(df, sig_gap,
dict(side=side, anchor_hour=0, thr=thr, exit_mode="eod"))
line += (f"{a} OOS={oos.net_return*100:>+6.0f}% "
f"(t{oos.n_trades:>4d} w{oos.win_rate:>4.1f} s{oos.sharpe:>+4.1f}) | ")
print(line)
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------
# PASS 4 — PRIOR-WEEK high/low breakout (continuation vs fade), EOD exit.
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------
hdr("PASS 4 — PRIOR-WEEK HIGH/LOW breakout, any-bar first-break, EOD exit (1h, fee=0.001).")
for level in ["high", "low"]:
for side in ["cont", "fade"]:
name = f"PW {level:<4s} {side}"
line = f" {name:<26s} | "
for a in assets:
df = data[(a, "1h")]
_, is_, oos = run_split(df, sig_prior_break,
dict(period="W", level=level, side=side,
exit_mode="eod"))
line += (f"{a} IS={is_.net_return*100:>+6.0f}% OOS={oos.net_return*100:>+6.0f}% "
f"(t{oos.n_trades:>4d} s{oos.sharpe:>+4.1f}) | ")
print(line)
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------
# PASS 5 — TIME-ANCHORED prior-day breakout: sweep the anchor hour to expose
# whether any apparent edge is just a lucky single hour.
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------
hdr("PASS 5 — TIME-ANCHORED PD-high CONTINUATION across UTC anchor hours (1h, EOD exit).\n"
" A real edge is NOT a single lucky hour. (full-sample net per hour.)")
hours = list(range(0, 24, 1 if not args.quick else 3))
for a in assets:
df = data[(a, "1h")]
cells = []
for hh in hours:
full, _, _ = run_split(df, sig_prior_break,
dict(period="D", level="high", side="cont",
anchor_hour=hh, exit_mode="eod"))
cells.append((hh, full.net_return * 100, full.sharpe, full.n_trades))
pos = sum(1 for _, r, _, _ in cells if r > 0)
print(f" {a}: {pos}/{len(cells)} anchor-hours net>0 (full). "
f"best={max(cells, key=lambda x: x[1])[0]}h "
f"({max(c[1] for c in cells):+.0f}%) worst={min(c[1] for c in cells):+.0f}%")
line = " " + " ".join(f"{hh:02d}h:{r:>+5.0f}" for hh, r, _, _ in cells)
print(line)
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------
# PASS 6 — GRID ROBUSTNESS on the best family from PASS 1-4. We grid the
# PD-low CONTINUATION and FADE plus OR breakout, require OOS>0 on BOTH assets.
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------
hdr("PASS 6 — GRID ROBUSTNESS. Cell SURVIVES only if OOS net>0 on BOTH BTC AND ETH.")
def grid(label, fn, base, sweep, tf="1h", fee=0.001):
keys = list(sweep.keys())
rows, surv = [], []
for combo in product(*[sweep[k] for k in keys]):
params = dict(base); params.update(dict(zip(keys, combo)))
res = {}
for a in assets:
_, is_, oos = run_split(data[(a, tf)], fn, params, fee_rt=fee)
res[a] = oos
ok = all(res[a].net_return > 0 for a in assets)
rows.append((params, res, ok))
if ok:
surv.append((params, res))
print(f" [{label}] {len(surv)}/{len(rows)} cells OOS>0 on BOTH assets")
rows.sort(key=lambda r: np.mean([r[1][a].net_return for a in assets]), reverse=True)
for params, res, ok in rows[:5]:
tag = "OK " if ok else " -"
pp = {k: params[k] for k in sweep}
s = f" {tag}{pp} | "
for a in assets:
s += f"{a} OOS={res[a].net_return*100:>+6.0f}% (s{res[a].sharpe:>+4.1f}) "
print(s)
return surv
sweeps = []
sweeps.append(grid("PD-low cont", sig_prior_break,
dict(period="D", level="low", side="cont", exit_mode="eod"),
dict(buffer=[0.0, 0.001, 0.003], anchor_hour=[None])))
sweeps.append(grid("PD-low fade", sig_prior_break,
dict(period="D", level="low", side="fade", exit_mode="eod"),
dict(buffer=[0.0, 0.001, 0.003], anchor_hour=[None])))
sweeps.append(grid("PD-high cont", sig_prior_break,
dict(period="D", level="high", side="cont", exit_mode="eod"),
dict(buffer=[0.0, 0.001, 0.003], anchor_hour=[None])))
sweeps.append(grid("PD-high fade", sig_prior_break,
dict(period="D", level="high", side="fade", exit_mode="eod"),
dict(buffer=[0.0, 0.001, 0.003], anchor_hour=[None])))
if not args.quick:
sweeps.append(grid("OR cont", sig_or_break,
dict(side="cont", exit_mode="eod"),
dict(n_open_hours=[3, 6, 8, 12])))
sweeps.append(grid("OR fade", sig_or_break,
dict(side="fade", exit_mode="eod"),
dict(n_open_hours=[3, 6, 8, 12])))
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------
# PASS 7 — FEE SWEEP + per-year on the single best surviving rule (if any),
# else on the least-bad PD rule, to show fee sensitivity and year stability.
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------
hdr("PASS 7 — FEE SWEEP + PER-YEAR on the best PD rule. fee=0 is GROSS (is the SIGN of\n"
" the edge even right before fees?).")
# pick best rule: scan the 4 PD sides at default, mean OOS over assets
candidates = [
("PD low cont", dict(period="D", level="low", side="cont", exit_mode="eod")),
("PD low fade", dict(period="D", level="low", side="fade", exit_mode="eod")),
("PD high cont", dict(period="D", level="high", side="cont", exit_mode="eod")),
("PD high fade", dict(period="D", level="high", side="fade", exit_mode="eod")),
]
scored = []
for nm, p in candidates:
m = np.mean([run_split(data[(a, "1h")], sig_prior_break, p)[2].net_return for a in assets])
scored.append((m, nm, p))
scored.sort(reverse=True)
best_nm, best_p = scored[0][1], scored[0][2]
print(f" best-by-meanOOS PD rule: {best_nm} (meanOOS={scored[0][0]*100:+.0f}%)")
fees = [0.0, 0.0005, 0.001, 0.0015, 0.002]
for a in assets:
df = data[(a, "1h")]
line = f" {a} fee-sweep (RT%): "
for f in fees:
full, _, oos = run_split(df, sig_prior_break, best_p, fee_rt=f)
line += f"{f*100:.2f}%[full={full.net_return*100:>+5.0f}/OOS={oos.net_return*100:>+5.0f}] "
print(line)
print(" per-year (full sample, fee=0.001):")
for a in assets:
df = data[(a, "1h")]
full, _, _ = run_split(df, sig_prior_break, best_p)
yrs = " ".join(f"{y}:{full.yearly[y]*100:>+5.0f}%" for y in sorted(full.yearly))
print(f" {a}: trades={full.n_trades} Sharpe={full.sharpe:+.2f} "
f"maxDD={full.max_dd*100:.0f}% EUR/d(2k)={full.daily_profit(2000):+.2f}")
print(f" {yrs}")
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------
# VERDICT
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------
hdr("VERDICT")
total_surv = sum(len(s) for s in sweeps)
if total_surv == 0:
print(" ZERO grid cells produced OOS net>0 on BOTH BTC and ETH at baseline fees.")
print(" => No robust prior-period breakout/fade edge on clean BTC/ETH. The continuation-")
print(" vs-fade tables above show which SIDE (if any) is even net-positive in-sample;")
print(" consult PASS 1-5 for direction. Not deployable.")
else:
print(f" {total_surv} grid cell(s) survived OOS>0 on both assets. Inspect PASS 6/7 and")
print(" stress with fee sweep + per-year before trusting. List of survivors:")
for s in sweeps:
for params, res in s:
ms = np.mean([res[a].net_return for a in assets]) * 100
print(f" {params} meanOOS={ms:+.0f}%")
print(f"\n (elapsed {time.time()-t0:.0f}s)")
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
+602
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,602 @@
"""TRACK H — VOLUME, RANGE & VOLATILITY-REGIME signals on CLEAN BTC/ETH (Deribit mainnet).
The single question: net of realistic Deribit fees, OOS-robust on BOTH BTC & ETH, on >=12h
timeframes (the only honest regime — sub-12h is fees + HF-noise overfit + the open-label
look-ahead trap), is there ANY volume / range / volatility-regime signal that is
(a) net-positive OOS on both assets standalone, AND
(b) uncorrelated (|corr| < ~0.3) to the deployed winner TP01, AND/OR
(c) usable as a REGIME FILTER that lifts TP01's Sharpe above ~1.32 or cuts its DD?
HONESTY / NO LOOK-AHEAD:
* Everything runs on the SAME causal per-bar engine used by TP01 (net_returns): we build a
continuous TARGET position decided with data <= close[i], then HOLD it during bar i+1
(pos_held[t] = target[t-1]). Gross = pos_held * simple_return[t]; fee charged on |Δpos|.
This is identical in spirit to the harness `backtest_signals` (decide<=close[i], fill at
close[i]); we cross-check two discrete signals through `backtest_signals` too.
* Volume / range / vol features for bar i use ONLY bars <= i (rolling, prior-window, shift).
* 12h / 1d frames are resampled from the certified 1h feed via resample_tf (label='left',
closed='left') and consumed index-based with the +1 bar hold -> the open-label is never
leaked (verified in trackD_lookahead_audit.py: Sharpe is label-invariant under this hold).
Run:
uv run python scripts/research/trackH_volume_vol.py # full (12h + 1d)
uv run python scripts/research/trackH_volume_vol.py --quick # 12h only, fewer grids
"""
from __future__ import annotations
import argparse
import sys
from pathlib import Path
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
sys.path.insert(0, str(Path(__file__).resolve().parents[2]))
from src.backtest.harness import load, backtest_signals
from src.strategies.trend_portfolio import TrendPortfolio, CANONICAL, resample_tf
ASSETS = ["BTC", "ETH"]
FEE_SIDE = 0.0005 # 0.05%/side = 0.10% RT (Deribit taker)
OOS_FRAC = 0.65
TF_BPD = {"12h": 2, "1d": 1}
# ===========================================================================
# Causal feature helpers (all use data <= i)
# ===========================================================================
def simple_returns(c: np.ndarray) -> np.ndarray:
r = np.zeros(len(c))
r[1:] = c[1:] / c[:-1] - 1.0
return r
def realized_vol(r: np.ndarray, win: int, bpy: float) -> np.ndarray:
return pd.Series(r).rolling(win, min_periods=max(2, win // 2)).std().values * np.sqrt(bpy)
def roll_max_prior(x: np.ndarray, win: int) -> np.ndarray:
"""Max over the PRIOR `win` bars (excludes current bar i)."""
return pd.Series(x).shift(1).rolling(win, min_periods=win).max().values
def roll_min_prior(x: np.ndarray, win: int) -> np.ndarray:
return pd.Series(x).shift(1).rolling(win, min_periods=win).min().values
def roll_mean_prior(x: np.ndarray, win: int) -> np.ndarray:
return pd.Series(x).shift(1).rolling(win, min_periods=win).mean().values
def vol_zscore(vol: np.ndarray, win: int) -> np.ndarray:
"""z-score of current volume vs PRIOR `win` bars (uses <= i)."""
s = pd.Series(vol)
m = s.shift(1).rolling(win, min_periods=win).mean()
sd = s.shift(1).rolling(win, min_periods=win).std()
return ((s - m) / sd).values
def atr(df: pd.DataFrame, period: int) -> np.ndarray:
h, l, c = df["high"].values, df["low"].values, df["close"].values
pc = np.roll(c, 1)
pc[0] = c[0]
tr = np.maximum(h - l, np.maximum(np.abs(h - pc), np.abs(l - pc)))
return pd.Series(tr).ewm(alpha=1.0 / period, adjust=False).mean().values
# ===========================================================================
# Per-bar net-returns engine (causal, fee on turnover) — identical to TP01.net_returns
# ===========================================================================
def net_from_target(target: np.ndarray, r: np.ndarray, fee_side: float):
"""target[i] decided with data <= close[i] -> HELD during bar i+1."""
target = np.nan_to_num(target, nan=0.0)
pos = np.zeros(len(target))
pos[1:] = target[:-1]
gross = pos * r
turn = np.abs(np.diff(pos, prepend=0.0))
net = gross - fee_side * turn
net[0] = 0.0
net = np.clip(net, -0.99, None)
return net, pos, turn
def metrics(net: np.ndarray, idx: pd.DatetimeIndex, turn: np.ndarray, bpy: float) -> dict:
rr = net[np.isfinite(net)]
sharpe = float(np.mean(rr) / np.std(rr) * np.sqrt(bpy)) if np.std(rr) > 0 else 0.0
equity = np.cumprod(1.0 + np.clip(net, -0.99, None))
peak = np.maximum.accumulate(equity)
dd = float(np.max((peak - equity) / peak)) if len(equity) else 0.0
span_days = (idx[-1] - idx[0]).total_seconds() / 86400
years = span_days / 365.25 if span_days > 0 else 1.0
total = equity[-1] / equity[0] if len(equity) else 1.0
cagr = total ** (1 / years) - 1 if years > 0 and total > 0 else -1.0
ann_turn = float(np.sum(turn)) / years if years > 0 else 0.0
return dict(sharpe=sharpe, max_dd=dd, cagr=cagr, total=total - 1,
ann_turnover=ann_turn, equity=equity, years=years)
def per_year(net: np.ndarray, idx: pd.DatetimeIndex) -> dict:
eq = pd.Series(np.cumprod(1.0 + np.clip(net, -0.99, None)), index=idx)
out = {}
for y, g in eq.groupby(eq.index.year):
if len(g) > 1 and g.iloc[0] > 0:
out[int(y)] = float(g.iloc[-1] / g.iloc[0] - 1)
return out
# ===========================================================================
# SIGNALS — each returns a continuous TARGET array (frac of equity, +/-), causal.
# ===========================================================================
def sig_vt_long(df, bpd, target_vol=0.20, vol_win_days=30, lev=2.0, **_):
"""Volatility-managed LONG: always long, sized to a vol target (no trend at all).
Tests Moreira-Muir 'volatility-managed' alpha vs plain buy-and-hold."""
c = df["close"].values.astype(float)
r = simple_returns(c)
bpy = bpd * 365.25
vol = realized_vol(r, vol_win_days * bpd, bpy)
tgt = np.where((vol > 0) & np.isfinite(vol), target_vol / vol, 0.0)
return np.clip(tgt, 0, lev)
def sig_vol_breakout(df, bpd, don=20, zwin=20, zk=1.0, long_short=False, **_):
"""Volume-confirmed Donchian breakout (continuation). Long when close > prior-`don`-bar high
AND volume z-score > zk; stay long until close < prior-`don`-bar low (then flat/short)."""
c = df["close"].values.astype(float)
h = df["high"].values.astype(float)
l = df["low"].values.astype(float)
vol = df["volume"].values.astype(float)
hi = roll_max_prior(h, don)
lo = roll_min_prior(l, don)
z = vol_zscore(vol, zwin)
up = (c > hi) & (z > zk)
dn = (c < lo) & (z > zk)
state = np.zeros(len(c))
s = 0.0
for i in range(len(c)):
if up[i]:
s = 1.0
elif dn[i]:
s = -1.0 if long_short else 0.0
elif s == 1.0 and c[i] < lo[i]: # trailing exit for longs
s = -1.0 if long_short else 0.0
elif s == -1.0 and c[i] > hi[i]:
s = 1.0
state[i] = s
return state
def sig_obv_trend(df, bpd, ma=30, long_short=False, **_):
"""OBV trend: OBV = cumsum(sign(ret)*volume); long when OBV > its EMA(ma), else flat/short."""
c = df["close"].values.astype(float)
vol = df["volume"].values.astype(float)
r = simple_returns(c)
obv = np.cumsum(np.sign(r) * vol)
ema = pd.Series(obv).ewm(span=ma, adjust=False).mean().values
d = np.where(obv > ema, 1.0, (-1.0 if long_short else 0.0))
return d
def sig_vw_momentum(df, bpd, mom_win=30, vol_win_days=30, target_vol=0.20, lev=2.0,
long_only=True, **_):
"""Volume-weighted momentum: sign of volume-weighted mean return over `mom_win` bars,
vol-targeted. Compare to plain TSMOM (does weighting by volume add anything?)."""
c = df["close"].values.astype(float)
vol = df["volume"].values.astype(float)
r = simple_returns(c)
rw = r * vol
num = pd.Series(rw).rolling(mom_win, min_periods=mom_win).sum().values
den = pd.Series(vol).rolling(mom_win, min_periods=mom_win).sum().values
vwret = np.where(den > 0, num / den, 0.0)
direction = np.sign(vwret)
if long_only:
direction = np.clip(direction, 0, None)
bpy = bpd * 365.25
rv = realized_vol(r, vol_win_days * bpd, bpy)
scal = np.where((rv > 0) & np.isfinite(rv), target_vol / rv, 0.0)
return np.clip(direction * scal, -lev, lev)
def sig_range_expansion(df, bpd, rng_win=20, k=1.5, hold=5, long_short=False, **_):
"""Range-expansion breakout: when today's range > k * avg(prior `rng_win` ranges) and the
bar closed in the upper/lower half, go with the close direction; hold `hold` bars."""
c = df["close"].values.astype(float)
h = df["high"].values.astype(float)
l = df["low"].values.astype(float)
rng = h - l
avg = roll_mean_prior(rng, rng_win)
expand = rng > k * avg
pos_in_bar = np.where(rng > 0, (c - l) / rng, 0.5)
long_trig = expand & (pos_in_bar > 0.6)
short_trig = expand & (pos_in_bar < 0.4)
state = np.zeros(len(c))
hold_left = 0
cur = 0.0
for i in range(len(c)):
if hold_left > 0:
hold_left -= 1
else:
cur = 0.0
if long_trig[i]:
cur = 1.0
hold_left = hold
elif short_trig[i] and long_short:
cur = -1.0
hold_left = hold
state[i] = cur
return state
def sig_nr_breakout(df, bpd, nr=7, hold=5, long_short=False, **_):
"""NR-N breakout (daily-style): when the current bar's range is the narrowest of the last
`nr` bars, take the breakout of the prior bar's high/low on the next bars; hold `hold`."""
c = df["close"].values.astype(float)
h = df["high"].values.astype(float)
l = df["low"].values.astype(float)
rng = h - l
is_nr = pd.Series(rng).rolling(nr, min_periods=nr).apply(
lambda w: 1.0 if w[-1] == np.min(w) else 0.0, raw=True).values
state = np.zeros(len(c))
cur = 0.0
hold_left = 0
armed = False
arm_hi = arm_lo = np.nan
for i in range(len(c)):
if hold_left > 0:
hold_left -= 1
else:
cur = 0.0
if armed:
if c[i] > arm_hi:
cur = 1.0
hold_left = hold
armed = False
elif c[i] < arm_lo and long_short:
cur = -1.0
hold_left = hold
armed = False
if is_nr[i] == 1.0:
armed = True
arm_hi = h[i]
arm_lo = l[i]
state[i] = cur
return state
def sig_decl_vol_reversal(df, bpd, mom_win=10, vwin=10, **_):
"""Declining-volume reversal (fade): after an up-move on DECLINING volume, fade (short);
after a down-move on declining volume, go long. Pure contrarian, vol-confirmed exhaustion."""
c = df["close"].values.astype(float)
vol = df["volume"].values.astype(float)
ret = pd.Series(c).pct_change(mom_win).values
vtrend = vol - roll_mean_prior(vol, vwin)
declining = vtrend < 0
state = np.zeros(len(c))
state[(ret > 0) & declining] = -1.0
state[(ret < 0) & declining] = 1.0
return state
SIGNALS = {
"VT-long": (sig_vt_long, dict(target_vol=0.20, vol_win_days=30, lev=2.0)),
"VolBreakout": (sig_vol_breakout, dict(don=20, zwin=20, zk=1.0)),
"OBV-trend": (sig_obv_trend, dict(ma=30)),
"VW-mom": (sig_vw_momentum, dict(mom_win=30, vol_win_days=30)),
"RangeExpand": (sig_range_expansion, dict(rng_win=20, k=1.5, hold=5)),
"NR7-break": (sig_nr_breakout, dict(nr=7, hold=5)),
"DeclVolRev": (sig_decl_vol_reversal, dict(mom_win=10, vwin=10)),
}
# ===========================================================================
# Evaluation
# ===========================================================================
def eval_signal(fn, params, tf, asset, fee_side=FEE_SIDE):
df = resample_tf(load(asset, "1h"), tf)
bpd = TF_BPD[tf]
bpy = bpd * 365.25
c = df["close"].values.astype(float)
r = simple_returns(c)
idx = pd.to_datetime(df["datetime"].values)
tgt = fn(df, bpd, **params)
net, pos, turn = net_from_target(tgt, r, fee_side)
m = metrics(net, idx, turn, bpy)
# OOS split
cut = int(len(net) * OOS_FRAC)
mi = metrics(net[:cut], idx[:cut], turn[:cut], bpy)
mo = metrics(net[cut:], idx[cut:], turn[cut:], bpy)
return dict(net=net, idx=idx, full=m, is_=mi, oos=mo, py=per_year(net, idx))
def tp01_net(asset, tf):
tp = TrendPortfolio(**CANONICAL)
df = resample_tf(load(asset, "1h"), tf)
net, ts = tp.net_returns(df)
return pd.Series(net, index=pd.to_datetime(ts.values))
def corr_to_tp01(net, idx, tp_series):
s = pd.Series(net, index=idx)
j = pd.concat([s.rename("a"), tp_series.rename("b")], axis=1, join="inner").fillna(0.0)
if j["a"].std() == 0 or j["b"].std() == 0:
return 0.0
return float(j["a"].corr(j["b"]))
# ===========================================================================
# Reports
# ===========================================================================
def report_headline(tf, quick):
print("\n" + "=" * 120)
print(f"# HEADLINE — TF {tf} | standalone signals, full / IS / OOS, turnover, corr→TP01 (fee 0.10% RT)")
print("=" * 120)
tp = {a: tp01_net(a, tf) for a in ASSETS}
print(f" {'signal':<14s}{'asset':<6s}"
f"{'fullShrp':>9s}{'fullCAGR':>9s}{'fullDD':>7s}"
f"{'IS_Shrp':>8s}{'OOS_Shrp':>9s}{'OOS_ret':>8s}{'turn/y':>8s}{'corrTP':>8s}")
results = {}
for name, (fn, params) in SIGNALS.items():
for a in ASSETS:
res = eval_signal(fn, params, tf, a)
cr = corr_to_tp01(res["net"], res["idx"], tp[a])
results[(name, a)] = (res, cr)
print(f" {name:<14s}{a:<6s}"
f"{res['full']['sharpe']:>9.2f}{res['full']['cagr']*100:>8.1f}%"
f"{res['full']['max_dd']*100:>6.1f}%"
f"{res['is_']['sharpe']:>8.2f}{res['oos']['sharpe']:>9.2f}"
f"{res['oos']['total']*100:>7.1f}%{res['full']['ann_turnover']:>8.1f}{cr:>8.2f}")
return results, tp
def report_peryear(results):
print("\n" + "-" * 120)
print("# PER-YEAR net return (%) — only signals with OOS Sharpe>0 on BOTH assets shown")
print("-" * 120)
years = list(range(2018, 2027))
# which signals pass OOS>0 both assets
good = []
for name in SIGNALS:
if all(results[(name, a)][0]["oos"]["sharpe"] > 0 for a in ASSETS):
good.append(name)
if not good:
print(" (none — no signal has positive OOS Sharpe on BOTH assets)")
return good
print(" " + " " * 22 + "".join(f"{y:>7d}" for y in years))
for name in good:
for a in ASSETS:
py = results[(name, a)][0]["py"]
row = "".join((" . " if y not in py else f"{py[y]*100:>+7.0f}") for y in years)
print(f" {name+' '+a:<22s}{row}")
return good
def report_grid(quick):
print("\n" + "=" * 120)
print("# GRID ROBUSTNESS (TF 12h) — fraction of cells with positive full+OOS Sharpe on BOTH assets")
print("=" * 120)
tf = "12h"
grids = {
"VolBreakout": ("sig", sig_vol_breakout,
dict(don=[10, 20, 40] if not quick else [20],
zwin=[10, 20, 40], zk=[0.5, 1.0, 2.0])),
"OBV-trend": ("sig", sig_obv_trend, dict(ma=[15, 30, 60, 100])),
"VW-mom": ("sig", sig_vw_momentum,
dict(mom_win=[15, 30, 60, 90], long_only=[True])),
"RangeExpand": ("sig", sig_range_expansion,
dict(rng_win=[10, 20, 40], k=[1.3, 1.5, 2.0], hold=[3, 5, 10])),
"VT-long": ("sig", sig_vt_long, dict(target_vol=[0.15, 0.20, 0.30],
vol_win_days=[15, 30, 60])),
}
from itertools import product
for name, (_, fn, axes) in grids.items():
keys = list(axes.keys())
combos = list(product(*[axes[k] for k in keys]))
npos = 0
best = (-9, None)
for combo in combos:
params = dict(zip(keys, combo))
ok = True
sh_sum = 0.0
for a in ASSETS:
res = eval_signal(fn, params, tf, a)
if not (res["full"]["sharpe"] > 0 and res["oos"]["sharpe"] > 0):
ok = False
sh_sum += res["oos"]["sharpe"]
if ok:
npos += 1
if sh_sum > best[0]:
best = (sh_sum, params)
print(f" {name:<14s} positive both(full&OOS): {npos:>3d}/{len(combos):<3d} "
f"({npos/len(combos)*100:>4.0f}%) best OOS-sum cfg: {best[1]}")
def report_feesweep():
print("\n" + "=" * 120)
print("# FEE SWEEP (TF 12h) — OOS Sharpe (BTC/ETH) vs round-trip fee for the headline signals")
print("=" * 120)
tf = "12h"
fees = [0.0, 0.0005, 0.001, 0.0015, 0.002] # per side; RT = 2x
print(f" {'signal':<14s}" + "".join(f" RT{f*2*100:>4.2f}%" for f in fees))
for name, (fn, params) in SIGNALS.items():
cells = []
for f in fees:
shs = []
for a in ASSETS:
res = eval_signal(fn, params, tf, a, fee_side=f)
shs.append(res["oos"]["sharpe"])
cells.append(f"{shs[0]:>4.2f}/{shs[1]:<4.2f}")
print(f" {name:<14s}" + "".join(f" {c:>9s}" for c in cells))
# ===========================================================================
# REGIME FILTER on TP01 — does a vol/volume regime mask lift Sharpe or cut DD?
# ===========================================================================
def vol_regime_mask(df, bpd, win_days=30, mode="low", q=0.5):
"""Boolean per-bar mask (decided <= close[i]) for a realized-vol regime.
mode='low': keep exposure when vol <= rolling median; 'high': when vol > median."""
c = df["close"].values.astype(float)
r = simple_returns(c)
bpy = bpd * 365.25
vol = realized_vol(r, win_days * bpd, bpy)
# causal expanding/rolling quantile threshold (use a long rolling window, prior bars)
thr = pd.Series(vol).shift(1).rolling(180 * bpd, min_periods=30 * bpd).quantile(q).values
if mode == "low":
mask = vol <= thr
else:
mask = vol > thr
return np.nan_to_num(mask.astype(float), nan=1.0) # default keep before warmup
def vol_managed_mask(df, bpd, win_days=30, target_vol=0.20, cap=1.5):
"""Continuous vol-scaling multiplier on TP01: scale exposure by target_vol/realized_vol,
capped — an explicit volatility-managed overlay distinct from TP01's own sizing."""
c = df["close"].values.astype(float)
r = simple_returns(c)
bpy = bpd * 365.25
vol = realized_vol(r, win_days * bpd, bpy)
mult = np.where((vol > 0) & np.isfinite(vol), target_vol / vol, 1.0)
return np.clip(mult, 0.0, cap)
def report_regime_filter(tf="12h"):
print("\n" + "=" * 120)
print(f"# REGIME FILTER on TP01 (TF {tf}) — apply a vol mask/overlay to TP01 target, 50/50 portfolio")
print("=" * 120)
bpd = TF_BPD[tf]
bpy = bpd * 365.25
tp = TrendPortfolio(**CANONICAL)
def portfolio(transform):
"""transform(df,target)->target'; returns combined 50/50 net series + idx."""
series = {}
for a in ASSETS:
df = resample_tf(load(a, "1h"), tf)
r = simple_returns(df["close"].values.astype(float))
tgt = tp.target_series(df)
tgt2 = transform(df, tgt)
net, _, _ = net_from_target(tgt2, r, CANONICAL["fee_side"])
series[a] = pd.Series(net, index=pd.to_datetime(df["datetime"].values))
J = pd.concat(series, axis=1, join="inner").fillna(0.0)
combo = 0.5 * J[ASSETS[0]].values + 0.5 * J[ASSETS[1]].values
return combo, J.index
variants = {
"TP01 baseline": lambda df, t: t,
"× keep LOW-vol": lambda df, t: t * vol_regime_mask(df, bpd, mode="low", q=0.5),
"× keep HIGH-vol": lambda df, t: t * vol_regime_mask(df, bpd, mode="high", q=0.5),
"× keep LOW-vol q.7": lambda df, t: t * vol_regime_mask(df, bpd, mode="low", q=0.7),
"× vol-managed x1.5": lambda df, t: t * vol_managed_mask(df, bpd, cap=1.5) /
np.maximum(vol_managed_mask(df, bpd, cap=1.5).mean(), 1e-9),
"× obv-up only": lambda df, t: t * (np.where(
np.cumsum(np.sign(simple_returns(df['close'].values.astype(float))) * df['volume'].values)
> pd.Series(np.cumsum(np.sign(simple_returns(df['close'].values.astype(float)))
* df['volume'].values)).ewm(span=30, adjust=False).mean().values,
1.0, 0.0)),
}
print(f" {'variant':<22s}{'fullShrp':>9s}{'IS_Shrp':>8s}{'OOS_Shrp':>9s}"
f"{'CAGR':>8s}{'maxDD':>8s}{'turn/y':>9s}")
for name, tr in variants.items():
combo, idx = portfolio(tr)
m = metrics(combo, idx, np.zeros_like(combo), bpy)
cut = int(len(combo) * OOS_FRAC)
mi = metrics(combo[:cut], idx[:cut], np.zeros_like(combo[:cut]), bpy)
mo = metrics(combo[cut:], idx[cut:], np.zeros_like(combo[cut:]), bpy)
tt = 0.0
for a in ASSETS:
df = resample_tf(load(a, "1h"), tf)
tgt2 = tr(df, tp.target_series(df))
tt += np.sum(np.abs(np.diff(np.nan_to_num(tgt2), prepend=0.0)))
ann_tt = tt / m["years"] / 2.0
print(f" {name:<22s}{m['sharpe']:>9.2f}{mi['sharpe']:>8.2f}{mo['sharpe']:>9.2f}"
f"{m['cagr']*100:>7.1f}%{m['max_dd']*100:>7.1f}%{ann_tt:>9.1f}")
# robustness of the OBV-up filter across EMA spans (is 1.49 luck or stable?)
print("\n OBV-up filter robustness across EMA span (full / OOS Sharpe, maxDD):")
for span in [15, 20, 30, 45, 60, 90]:
def tr(df, t, sp=span):
c = df['close'].values.astype(float)
v = df['volume'].values.astype(float)
obv = np.cumsum(np.sign(simple_returns(c)) * v)
ema = pd.Series(obv).ewm(span=sp, adjust=False).mean().values
return t * np.where(obv > ema, 1.0, 0.0)
combo, idx = portfolio(tr)
m = metrics(combo, idx, np.zeros_like(combo), bpy)
cut = int(len(combo) * OOS_FRAC)
mo = metrics(combo[cut:], idx[cut:], np.zeros_like(combo[cut:]), bpy)
py = per_year(combo, idx)
neg_years = sum(1 for y, v in py.items() if v < 0)
print(f" span {span:>3d}: full {m['sharpe']:>4.2f} OOS {mo['sharpe']:>4.2f} "
f"DD {m['max_dd']*100:>4.1f}% CAGR {m['cagr']*100:>5.1f}% neg-years {neg_years}")
def main():
ap = argparse.ArgumentParser()
ap.add_argument("--quick", action="store_true")
args = ap.parse_args()
print("#" * 120)
print("# TRACK H — VOLUME / RANGE / VOLATILITY-REGIME on certified BTC/ETH (Deribit mainnet)")
print("# Honest engine: target decided <=close[i], held bar i+1; fee on |Δpos|; OOS 65/35; >=12h only.")
print("#" * 120)
tfs = ["12h"] if args.quick else ["12h", "1d"]
for tf in tfs:
results, tp = report_headline(tf, args.quick)
report_peryear(results)
if tf == "12h":
crosscheck_backtest_signals()
report_grid(args.quick)
report_feesweep()
report_regime_filter("12h")
print("\n" + "#" * 120)
print("# VERDICT (track H) — honest reading of the tables above")
print("#" * 120)
for line in [
"1. NO uncorrelated additive edge found. Every PROFITABLE volume/range/vol signal",
" (VolBreakout, OBV-trend, VW-mom, VT-long) is trend-in-disguise: corr-to-TP01 0.61-0.75.",
" They do not diversify TP01 -> cannot raise the 50/50 portfolio Sharpe.",
"2. The genuinely LOWER-corr signals (RangeExpand ~0.48, NR7 ~0.48) FAIL OOS on >=1 asset",
" (NR7 ETH OOS Sharpe ~0.0/-0.03; RangeExpand BTC weak, ETH negative on 1d). Not deployable.",
"3. Declining-volume / fade (mean-reversion) is firmly NEGATIVE net of fees on both assets",
" and at ZERO fee -> confirms the v2.0.0 lesson: MR edge was feed contamination, it is dead.",
"4. Vol-REGIME gating of TP01 (keep low-vol / keep high-vol) HURTS Sharpe (1.32 -> 0.94/0.98).",
" A vol-managed x1.5 overlay leaves Sharpe ~flat (1.33) but raises DD (17.9%). No win.",
"5. The ONLY non-harmful overlay is an OBV-up trend-CONFIRMATION filter (keep TP01 long only",
" while OBV>EMA): full Sharpe 1.32->1.49, maxDD 13.3%->10.1%, but CAGR 16.2%->14.4%, turnover",
" +60%, and OOS gain is marginal (0.90->1.04) and span-sensitive (fades for EMA>45). It is",
" trend double-confirmation (de-risking), NOT new alpha. Worth noting as a DEFENSIVE overlay",
" if cutting DD matters more than CAGR; it does NOT robustly raise the portfolio Sharpe.",
"BOTTOM LINE: the ~1.3 portfolio-Sharpe ceiling on BTC/ETH-only HOLDS. Volume/range/vol add",
"nothing uncorrelated. TP01 stays the deployable winner.",
]:
print(" " + line)
print("#" * 120)
def crosscheck_backtest_signals():
"""Cross-check two DISCRETE signals through the canonical harness `backtest_signals`
(decide<=close[i], fill at close[i]) to confirm the per-bar engine isn't flattering them."""
print("\n" + "-" * 120)
print("# CROSS-CHECK via harness.backtest_signals (discrete entries, fee 0.10% RT, TF 12h)")
print("-" * 120)
tf = "12h"
for a in ASSETS:
df = resample_tf(load(a, "1h"), tf)
h = df["high"].values.astype(float)
l = df["low"].values.astype(float)
c = df["close"].values.astype(float)
rng = h - l
avg = roll_mean_prior(rng, 20)
pos_in_bar = np.where(rng > 0, (c - l) / rng, 0.5)
expand = rng > 1.5 * avg
entries = [None] * len(df)
for i in range(len(df)):
if expand[i] and pos_in_bar[i] > 0.6:
entries[i] = dict(dir=1, tp=None, sl=None, max_bars=5)
m = backtest_signals(df, entries, fee_rt=0.001, leverage=1.0, asset=a, tf=tf)
m.print_summary(f"RangeExpand(L,5b) {a}")
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()
@@ -0,0 +1,420 @@
"""TRACK I — ALTERNATIVE MOMENTUM FORMULATIONS + LONG-HORIZON REVERSAL (BTC & ETH, >=12h).
Goal:
(A) Find a momentum formulation that BEATS or DIVERSIFIES the canonical TP01 sign-blend
(TSMOM 1-3-6m, vol-targeted, 50/50 BTC+ETH, 12h, Sharpe ~1.32).
(B) Test the classic LONG-HORIZON REVERSAL effect (fade 12/18/24-month winners) as a
potentially UNCORRELATED positive overlay, and a momentum+reversal blend.
Honest harness (mirrors src/strategies/trend_portfolio.py exactly):
- direction decided with data <= close[i]; positions HELD next bar (pos_held[1:] = tgt[:-1]);
- vol-target by inverse PAST-ONLY realized vol (target_vol/vol), leverage-capped;
- NET fees 0.10% RT (0.05%/side) on turnover; fee sweep included;
- 12h / 1d only (sub-12h is dominated by costs/overfit and a prior 4h look-ahead bug);
- OOS 65/35 split + per-year; robustness across lookbacks AND both assets;
- correlation vs TP01 net returns reported for EVERY candidate.
A candidate is INTERESTING only if net-positive OOS on BOTH assets AND either
(higher portfolio Sharpe than TP01 ~1.32) OR (|corr to TP01| < ~0.3 and positive).
Run: uv run python scripts/research/trackI_momentum_reversal.py
"""
from __future__ import annotations
import sys
from pathlib import Path
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
sys.path.insert(0, str(Path(__file__).resolve().parents[2]))
from src.backtest.harness import load
from src.strategies.trend_portfolio import resample_tf, simple_returns, realized_vol
ASSETS = ["BTC", "ETH"]
FEE_SIDE = 0.0005 # 0.05%/side = 0.10% RT
TARGET_VOL = 0.20
LEVERAGE = 2.0
VOL_WIN_DAYS = 30
OOS_FRAC = 0.65
MONTH = 30 # days per "month" (calendar-consistent across TFs)
# tf -> bars_per_day
TF_BPD = {"12h": 2, "1d": 1}
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# data
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
def get_df(asset: str, tf: str) -> pd.DataFrame:
df = load(asset, "1h")
rule = {"12h": "12h", "1d": "1D"}[tf]
return resample_tf(df, rule)
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# vol-target machinery (identical convention to TP01)
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
def build_target(direction, vol, long_only):
d = np.clip(direction, 0, None) if long_only else direction
scal = np.where((vol > 0) & np.isfinite(vol), TARGET_VOL / vol, 0.0)
tgt = np.clip(d * scal, -LEVERAGE, LEVERAGE)
tgt[~np.isfinite(tgt)] = 0.0
return tgt
def net_from_target(tgt, r, fee_side=FEE_SIDE):
pos_held = np.zeros(len(tgt))
pos_held[1:] = tgt[:-1]
gross = pos_held * r
turn = np.abs(np.diff(pos_held, prepend=0.0))
net = gross - fee_side * turn
net[0] = 0.0
return np.clip(net, -0.99, None)
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# DIRECTION FORMULATIONS (each returns array in roughly [-1, 1], causal, decided <= close[i])
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
def _log_mom(c, h):
"""log return over h bars; nan before h."""
m = np.full(len(c), np.nan)
m[h:] = np.log(c[h:] / c[:-h])
return m
def dir_signblend(c, bpd, horizons_m=(1, 3, 6)):
"""TP01 baseline: mean of sign(log return) over horizons."""
n = len(c)
acc = np.zeros(n); cnt = np.zeros(n)
for hm in horizons_m:
h = hm * MONTH * bpd
s = np.full(n, np.nan)
s[h:] = np.sign(c[h:] / c[:-h] - 1.0)
v = np.isfinite(s); acc[v] += s[v]; cnt[v] += 1
out = np.zeros(n); nz = cnt > 0; out[nz] = acc[nz] / cnt[nz]
return out
def dir_zscore(c, bpd, horizons_m=(1, 3, 6), std_win_m=12):
"""(i) Continuous momentum: z-scored cumulative log-return, tanh-bounded, multi-horizon avg."""
n = len(c); w = std_win_m * MONTH * bpd
acc = np.zeros(n); cnt = np.zeros(n)
for hm in horizons_m:
h = hm * MONTH * bpd
m = _log_mom(c, h)
s = pd.Series(m)
sd = s.rolling(w, min_periods=w // 3).std().values
z = np.where((sd > 0) & np.isfinite(sd), m / sd, np.nan)
d = np.tanh(z)
v = np.isfinite(d); acc[v] += d[v]; cnt[v] += 1
out = np.zeros(n); nz = cnt > 0; out[nz] = acc[nz] / cnt[nz]
return out
def dir_riskadj(c, bpd, horizons_m=(1, 3, 6)):
"""(ii) Risk-adjusted momentum: h-horizon return / vol-of-that-horizon, tanh, multi-horizon."""
n = len(c); r = simple_returns(c)
acc = np.zeros(n); cnt = np.zeros(n)
for hm in horizons_m:
h = hm * MONTH * bpd
ret = np.full(n, np.nan); ret[h:] = c[h:] / c[:-h] - 1.0
# vol of the h-bar return = per-bar std over last h bars * sqrt(h)
sd = pd.Series(r).rolling(h, min_periods=h // 2).std().values * np.sqrt(h)
ra = np.where((sd > 0) & np.isfinite(sd), ret / sd, np.nan)
d = np.tanh(ra)
v = np.isfinite(d); acc[v] += d[v]; cnt[v] += 1
out = np.zeros(n); nz = cnt > 0; out[nz] = acc[nz] / cnt[nz]
return out
def _ema(c, span):
return pd.Series(c).ewm(span=span, adjust=False).mean().values
def dir_emacross(c, bpd, pairs_m=((1, 3), (2, 6), (3, 9))):
"""(iii) EMA-cross trend: mean of sign(ema_fast - ema_slow) over calendar-day pairs."""
n = len(c)
acc = np.zeros(n); cnt = np.zeros(n)
for fm, sm in pairs_m:
ef = _ema(c, fm * MONTH * bpd)
es = _ema(c, sm * MONTH * bpd)
warm = sm * MONTH * bpd
d = np.sign(ef - es)
d[:warm] = np.nan
v = np.isfinite(d); acc[v] += d[v]; cnt[v] += 1
out = np.zeros(n); nz = cnt > 0; out[nz] = acc[nz] / cnt[nz]
return out
def dir_macd(c, bpd):
"""(iii-b) Classic MACD with calendar spans (fast~1m, slow~2m, signal~0.75m): sign(macd-signal)."""
n = len(c)
fast = int(round(1.0 * MONTH * bpd)); slow = int(round(2.0 * MONTH * bpd))
sig = int(round(0.75 * MONTH * bpd))
macd = _ema(c, fast) - _ema(c, slow)
signal = pd.Series(macd).ewm(span=sig, adjust=False).mean().values
d = np.sign(macd - signal)
d[:slow] = 0.0
return d
def dir_donchian(c, bpd, n_m=2):
"""(iv) Donchian breakout (>=12h): +1 if close > prior-N max, -1 if < prior-N min, else hold."""
n = len(c); N = n_m * MONTH * bpd
hi = pd.Series(c).rolling(N, min_periods=N).max().shift(1).values
lo = pd.Series(c).rolling(N, min_periods=N).min().shift(1).values
d = np.zeros(n); state = 0.0
for i in range(n):
if np.isfinite(hi[i]) and c[i] >= hi[i]:
state = 1.0
elif np.isfinite(lo[i]) and c[i] <= lo[i]:
state = -1.0
d[i] = state
return d
def dir_accel(c, bpd, horizons_m=(3, 6), lag_m=1):
"""(v) Acceleration: sign of CHANGE in momentum (mom[i] - mom[i-lag]) i.e. 2nd derivative."""
n = len(c); lag = lag_m * MONTH * bpd
acc = np.zeros(n); cnt = np.zeros(n)
for hm in horizons_m:
h = hm * MONTH * bpd
m = _log_mom(c, h)
dm = np.full(n, np.nan)
dm[lag:] = m[lag:] - m[:-lag]
d = np.sign(dm)
v = np.isfinite(d); acc[v] += d[v]; cnt[v] += 1
out = np.zeros(n); nz = cnt > 0; out[nz] = acc[nz] / cnt[nz]
return out
def dir_mom12_1(c, bpd, lookbacks_m=(6, 12), skip_m=1):
"""(vi) 12-1 momentum: return from (i-L) to (i-skip), skipping the most-recent `skip` month.
For index i (>=L): sign( c[i-skip] / c[i-L] - 1 ). Causal (uses data <= close[i-skip])."""
n = len(c); skip = skip_m * MONTH * bpd
acc = np.zeros(n); cnt = np.zeros(n)
for Lm in lookbacks_m:
L = Lm * MONTH * bpd
s = np.full(n, np.nan)
# i runs L..n-1: c[i-skip] = c[L-skip : n-skip], c[i-L] = c[0 : n-L]
s[L:] = np.sign(c[L - skip:n - skip] / c[:n - L] - 1.0)
v = np.isfinite(s); acc[v] += s[v]; cnt[v] += 1
out = np.zeros(n); nz = cnt > 0; out[nz] = acc[nz] / cnt[nz]
return out
def make_reversal(lookbacks_m):
"""(B) long-horizon reversal: -sign of long-horizon return (short past winners)."""
def fn(c, bpd):
n = len(c)
acc = np.zeros(n); cnt = np.zeros(n)
for Lm in lookbacks_m:
L = Lm * MONTH * bpd
s = np.full(n, np.nan)
s[L:] = -np.sign(c[L:] / c[:-L] - 1.0)
v = np.isfinite(s); acc[v] += s[v]; cnt[v] += 1
out = np.zeros(n); nz = cnt > 0; out[nz] = acc[nz] / cnt[nz]
return out
return fn
def make_mom_minus_rev(mom_m, rev_m, rev_w=0.5):
"""Blend: long medium-term momentum + fade very-long-term extension (weighted)."""
def fn(c, bpd):
n = len(c)
mom = dir_signblend(c, bpd, horizons_m=mom_m)
rev_fn = make_reversal(rev_m)
rev = rev_fn(c, bpd)
return np.clip(mom + rev_w * rev, -1.0, 1.0)
return fn
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# run a formulation -> per-asset net series, combined portfolio series, metrics
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
def asset_net_series(asset, tf, dir_fn, long_only, fee_side=FEE_SIDE):
df = get_df(asset, tf); bpd = TF_BPD[tf]
c = df["close"].values.astype(float)
r = simple_returns(c)
bpy = bpd * 365.25
vol = realized_vol(r, VOL_WIN_DAYS * bpd, bpy)
direction = dir_fn(c, bpd)
tgt = build_target(direction, vol, long_only)
net = net_from_target(tgt, r, fee_side)
return pd.Series(net, index=pd.to_datetime(df["datetime"].values))
def portfolio_combo(tf, dir_fn, long_only, fee_side=FEE_SIDE):
s = {a: asset_net_series(a, tf, dir_fn, long_only, fee_side) for a in ASSETS}
J = pd.concat(s, axis=1, join="inner").fillna(0.0)
combo = 0.5 * J[ASSETS[0]].values + 0.5 * J[ASSETS[1]].values
return pd.Series(combo, index=J.index), s
def sharpe_of(series, bpy):
r = series.values[np.isfinite(series.values)]
return float(np.mean(r) / np.std(r) * np.sqrt(bpy)) if len(r) and np.std(r) > 0 else 0.0
def metrics_of(combo: pd.Series, bpy):
idx = combo.index
equity = np.cumprod(1.0 + np.clip(combo.values, -0.99, None))
sharpe = sharpe_of(combo, bpy)
peak = np.maximum.accumulate(equity)
dd = float(np.max((peak - equity) / peak))
years = (idx[-1] - idx[0]).total_seconds() / 86400 / 365.25
total = equity[-1] / equity[0]
cagr = total ** (1 / years) - 1 if years > 0 and total > 0 else -1.0
eq = pd.Series(equity, index=idx)
yearly = {}
for y, g in eq.groupby(eq.index.year):
if len(g) > 1 and g.iloc[0] > 0:
v = g.values; pk = np.maximum.accumulate(v)
yearly[int(y)] = (float(g.iloc[-1] / g.iloc[0] - 1), float(np.max((pk - v) / pk)))
# OOS split
k = int(len(combo) * OOS_FRAC)
is_sh = sharpe_of(combo.iloc[:k], bpy)
oos_sh = sharpe_of(combo.iloc[k:], bpy)
return dict(sharpe=sharpe, max_dd=dd, cagr=cagr, total=total - 1,
yearly=yearly, is_sharpe=is_sh, oos_sharpe=oos_sh, equity=eq)
ALL_YEARS = list(range(2018, 2027))
def fmt_yearly(yearly):
return "".join((" . " if y not in yearly else f"{yearly[y][0]*100:>+6.0f}") for y in ALL_YEARS)
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
# main
# ---------------------------------------------------------------------------
PART_A = [
("baseline signblend 1-3-6m", dir_signblend),
("(i) z-score cum-ret", dir_zscore),
("(ii) risk-adj momentum", dir_riskadj),
("(iii) EMA-cross trend", dir_emacross),
("(iii-b) MACD", dir_macd),
("(iv) Donchian breakout", dir_donchian),
("(v) acceleration", dir_accel),
("(vi) 12-1 skip momentum", dir_mom12_1),
]
def report_block(title, items, tf, long_only, tp_combo, bpy):
mode = "LONG-FLAT" if long_only else "LONG-SHORT"
print(f"\n{'='*112}\n {title} | TF={tf} mode={mode}\n{'='*112}")
print(f" {'formulation':<26s} {'Shrp':>5s} {'IS':>5s} {'OOS':>5s} {'CAGR':>6s} "
f"{'maxDD':>6s} {'corrTP':>7s} {'aBTC':>5s} {'aETH':>5s} per-year PnL%")
print(f" {'':<26s} {'':>5s} {'':>5s} {'':>5s} {'':>6s} {'':>6s} {'':>7s} {'':>5s} {'':>5s} "
+ "".join(f"{y%100:>6d}" for y in ALL_YEARS))
results = {}
for name, fn in items:
combo, sleeves = portfolio_combo(tf, fn, long_only)
m = metrics_of(combo, bpy)
# per-asset standalone Sharpe
a_sh = {a: sharpe_of(sleeves[a], bpy) for a in ASSETS}
# correlation to TP01 (aligned inner)
J = pd.concat([combo.rename("x"), tp_combo.rename("t")], axis=1, join="inner").dropna()
corr = float(np.corrcoef(J["x"], J["t"])[0, 1]) if len(J) > 2 else float("nan")
print(f" {name:<26s} {m['sharpe']:>5.2f} {m['is_sharpe']:>5.2f} {m['oos_sharpe']:>5.2f} "
f"{m['cagr']*100:>+5.0f}% {m['max_dd']*100:>5.1f}% {corr:>7.2f} "
f"{a_sh['BTC']:>5.2f} {a_sh['ETH']:>5.2f} {fmt_yearly(m['yearly'])}")
results[name] = dict(metrics=m, corr=corr, combo=combo, a_sh=a_sh)
return results
def main():
print("#" * 112)
print("# TRACK I — alternative momentum formulations + long-horizon reversal (BTC&ETH, >=12h)")
print("# vol-target 20%, lev cap 2x, fee 0.10% RT, positions +1 bar, 50/50 BTC+ETH. OOS 65/35.")
print("#" * 112)
for tf in ("12h", "1d"):
bpy = TF_BPD[tf] * 365.25
# TP01 reference combo at this TF (long-flat canonical) for correlation
tp_combo, _ = portfolio_combo(tf, dir_signblend, long_only=True)
tp_m = metrics_of(tp_combo, bpy)
print(f"\n>>> TP01 reference @ {tf} (long-flat 1-3-6m): "
f"Sharpe {tp_m['sharpe']:.2f} IS {tp_m['is_sharpe']:.2f} OOS {tp_m['oos_sharpe']:.2f} "
f"CAGR {tp_m['cagr']*100:+.0f}% maxDD {tp_m['max_dd']*100:.1f}%")
# PART A — long-flat (fair vs canonical) and long-short
report_block("PART A — momentum formulations", PART_A, tf, True, tp_combo, bpy)
if tf == "12h":
report_block("PART A — momentum formulations (long-short)", PART_A, tf, False, tp_combo, bpy)
# ----- PART B: reversal + blends, focus 12h -----
tf = "12h"; bpy = TF_BPD[tf] * 365.25
tp_combo, _ = portfolio_combo(tf, dir_signblend, long_only=True)
rev_items = [
("reversal 12m", make_reversal((12,))),
("reversal 18m", make_reversal((18,))),
("reversal 24m", make_reversal((24,))),
("reversal 12-18-24m", make_reversal((12, 18, 24))),
]
print("\n\n" + "#" * 112)
print("# PART B — LONG-HORIZON REVERSAL (fade past winners). Must be net-positive AND uncorrelated.")
print("#" * 112)
revB = report_block("PART B — reversal (long-short)", rev_items, tf, False, tp_combo, bpy)
# reversal long-flat (long past losers only) for completeness
report_block("PART B — reversal (long-flat)", rev_items, tf, True, tp_combo, bpy)
blend_items = [
("mom(1-6) - 0.5*rev(12-24)", make_mom_minus_rev((1, 3, 6), (12, 24), 0.5)),
("mom(1-6) - 1.0*rev(12-24)", make_mom_minus_rev((1, 3, 6), (12, 24), 1.0)),
("mom(1-3) - 0.5*rev(18-24)", make_mom_minus_rev((1, 3), (18, 24), 0.5)),
]
report_block("PART B — momentum + reversal blend", blend_items, tf, True, tp_combo, bpy)
# ----- COMBINED PORTFOLIO: TP01 + best diversifier -----
print("\n\n" + "#" * 112)
print("# COMBINED: TP01 (long-flat) + candidate diversifier, blended on net returns")
print("#" * 112)
tp_m = metrics_of(tp_combo, bpy)
print(f" TP01 alone: Sharpe {tp_m['sharpe']:.3f} CAGR {tp_m['cagr']*100:+.0f}% maxDD {tp_m['max_dd']*100:.1f}%")
# candidates to try as overlay: the best A formulations + reversal variants
overlays = {
"z-score": (dir_zscore, True),
"risk-adj": (dir_riskadj, True),
"12-1 skip": (dir_mom12_1, True),
"reversal 12-18-24 LS": (make_reversal((12, 18, 24)), False),
"reversal 24m LS": (make_reversal((24,)), False),
}
for name, (fn, lo) in overlays.items():
cand, _ = portfolio_combo(tf, fn, lo)
J = pd.concat([tp_combo.rename("t"), cand.rename("c")], axis=1, join="inner").fillna(0.0)
corr = float(np.corrcoef(J["t"], J["c"])[0, 1])
for w in (0.5, 0.3, 0.2):
mix = pd.Series((1 - w) * J["t"].values + w * J["c"].values, index=J.index)
mm = metrics_of(mix, bpy)
tag = f"TP01 + {w:.0%} {name}"
print(f" {tag:<30s} Sharpe {mm['sharpe']:.3f} CAGR {mm['cagr']*100:+5.0f}% "
f"maxDD {mm['max_dd']*100:4.1f}% OOS {mm['oos_sharpe']:.2f} (corr={corr:+.2f})")
# ----- FEE SWEEP (robustness): 0.00 .. 0.40% RT -----
print("\n\n" + "#" * 112)
print("# FEE SWEEP — portfolio Sharpe @12h across round-trip fees (0.00-0.40% RT)")
print("#" * 112)
sweep = [
("baseline 1-3-6m (LF)", dir_signblend, True),
("z-score cum-ret (LF)", dir_zscore, True),
("MACD (LF)", dir_macd, True),
("mom(1-6)-0.5rev(12-24)(LF)", make_mom_minus_rev((1, 3, 6), (12, 24), 0.5), True),
("reversal 24m (LS)", make_reversal((24,)), False),
]
rts = [0.0, 0.0005, 0.0010, 0.0020, 0.0040]
print(f" {'formulation':<28s}" + "".join(f"{rt*100:>7.2f}%" for rt in rts) + " (RT)")
for name, fn, lo in sweep:
row = [sharpe_of(portfolio_combo(tf, fn, lo, fee_side=rt / 2)[0], bpy) for rt in rts]
print(f" {name:<28s}" + "".join(f"{v:>8.2f}" for v in row))
print("\nDone. See verdict in the script docstring / diary.")
if __name__ == "__main__":
main()