research(xsec): sweep cross-sectional su Hyperliquid (43 script/257 config) + verifica avversariale

Nuova harness condivisa xslib.py (panel HL certificato, score per-asset causale, book
long-k/short-k vol-targeted leak-free) + 43 script in runs/ su 11 famiglie (MOM/REV/VOL/
DIST/LIQ/VAL/STRUCT/UNIV). Scoring = earns_slot (full>0 AND hold-out>0 AND marginal ADDS
al portafoglio live AND corr XS01<0.6, con jackknife drop-one-month).

Find: 42/257 config earns_slot=True, ma TUTTE con corr TP01 -0.2..-0.4 e PnL ~solo 2025.
Verify (verify_survivors.py, 3 scettici deterministici):
 - S1 redundancy: cluster low-vol = UNA scommessa (XV01=XU02=1.00, XV02/XV03 r 0.44-0.67);
   XM09/XL02/XS06b/XR02 distinti (corr media off-diag +0.20).
 - S2 short-beta: cluster low-vol carica 0.44-0.70 su short-market -> NON market-neutral,
   e' un tilt short-alt-beta di regime. XM09(0.08)/XR02(-0.21) NON short-beta.
 - S3 per-anno: cluster low-vol decade (XV01/XU02 2026 -0.09); XL02 morto (2025 -0.14,
   2026 -0.43); XM09 (0.82/0.50/0.74) e XR02 (0.84/0.40/2.68) positivi in tutti e 3 gli anni.

Esito: nessuna sleeve nuova. Cluster low-vol RIGETTATO (regime-bet), XL02 RIGETTATO (overfit).
2 LEAD genuini (XM09 trend-gated x-sec momentum, XR02 reversal vol-gated) -> forward-monitor,
non deployabili (panel 2.5y regime unico + STAT-MODE esecuzione). Portafoglio live invariato.

Incluso anche options_vrp_managed.py (A/B VRP01 hold-to-expiry vs gestione attiva del doc
credit-spread): la gestione attiva DISTRUGGE l'edge (combo FULL managed Sh -1.29 vs HtE +0.96,
il delta-exit taglia i vincenti) -> scartata, VRP01 resta hold-to-expiry.

Diari: 2026-06-20-xsec-strategies-sweep.md, 2026-06-20-vrp-active-management.md.
gitignore: data/paper_portfolio/ (stato runtime paper) + scripts/research/xsec/runs/out/ (output rigenerabile).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
This commit is contained in:
Adriano Dal Pastro
2026-06-20 21:36:57 +00:00
parent 5ac4e16af8
commit 9612560479
50 changed files with 5457 additions and 0 deletions
+83
View File
@@ -0,0 +1,83 @@
"""XS04b — Ensemble z-vote cross-sectional strategy.
Score = mean of xs_zscore over {momentum90, -vol30, -skew60, -beta60}.
Each component is z-scored cross-sectionally per row, then averaged.
Diversified signal: momentum (strong assets), low vol (stable), negative skew
(avoid lottery stocks), low beta (idiosyncratic leaders).
Grid: universe x H x k — 5 calls max.
"""
import sys
sys.path.insert(0, "/opt/docker/PythagorasGoal/scripts/research/xsec")
import xslib as xs
import numpy as np
def score_matrix(P: xs.Panel) -> np.ndarray:
"""Ensemble z-vote: mean of four xs_zscored components (causal)."""
# 1. Momentum 90d: higher = stronger recent trend
mom90 = xs.past_return(P.close, 90)
z_mom = xs.xs_zscore(mom90)
# 2. Negative vol 30d: lower vol = more stable = prefer
vol30 = xs.roll_std(P.ret, 30)
z_vol = xs.xs_zscore(-vol30) # negative: lower vol -> higher score
# 3. Negative skew 60d: negative skew = avoid lottery/pump; prefer normal/negative-skew
skew60 = xs.roll_skew(P.ret, 60)
z_skew = xs.xs_zscore(-skew60) # negative: lower skew -> higher score
# 4. Negative beta 60d: low-beta assets have idiosyncratic edge in cross-section
beta60 = xs.roll_beta(P.ret, 60)
z_beta = xs.xs_zscore(-beta60) # negative: lower beta -> higher score
# Ensemble: simple mean across components (NaN-safe per cell)
stack = np.stack([z_mom, z_vol, z_skew, z_beta], axis=0)
score = np.nanmean(stack, axis=0)
return score
# ── Grid (5 calls max) ──────────────────────────────────────────────────────
results = []
# 1. Majors, H=10, k=5, L/S
r = xs.study_xs("XS04b_maj_H10_k5_ls", score_matrix, universe="majors",
H=10, k=5, long_short=True)
print(xs.fmt(r)); print("JSON:", xs.as_json(r))
results.append(r)
# 2. Majors, H=5, k=5, L/S (faster rebalance)
r = xs.study_xs("XS04b_maj_H5_k5_ls", score_matrix, universe="majors",
H=5, k=5, long_short=True)
print(xs.fmt(r)); print("JSON:", xs.as_json(r))
results.append(r)
# 3. All, H=10, k=5, L/S
r = xs.study_xs("XS04b_all_H10_k5_ls", score_matrix, universe="all",
H=10, k=5, long_short=True)
print(xs.fmt(r)); print("JSON:", xs.as_json(r))
results.append(r)
# 4. All, H=10, k=7, L/S (wider book)
r = xs.study_xs("XS04b_all_H10_k7_ls", score_matrix, universe="all",
H=10, k=7, long_short=True)
print(xs.fmt(r)); print("JSON:", xs.as_json(r))
results.append(r)
# 5. Majors, H=10, k=5, long-only (avoid short-side noise)
r = xs.study_xs("XS04b_maj_H10_k5_lo", score_matrix, universe="majors",
H=10, k=5, long_short=False)
print(xs.fmt(r)); print("JSON:", xs.as_json(r))
results.append(r)
# ── Pick best by: earns_slot > holdout > corr_xs01 distance ─────────────────
def score_rep(r):
es = 1 if r.get("earns_slot") else 0
ho = r.get("holdout", {}).get("sharpe", -99)
dist = 1 - abs(r.get("corr_xs01", 1)) # distinctness
return (es, ho, dist)
best = max(results, key=score_rep)
print("\n=== BEST CONFIG ===")
print(xs.fmt(best))
print("JSON:", xs.as_json(best))