Files
Adriano Dal Pastro 9612560479 research(xsec): sweep cross-sectional su Hyperliquid (43 script/257 config) + verifica avversariale
Nuova harness condivisa xslib.py (panel HL certificato, score per-asset causale, book
long-k/short-k vol-targeted leak-free) + 43 script in runs/ su 11 famiglie (MOM/REV/VOL/
DIST/LIQ/VAL/STRUCT/UNIV). Scoring = earns_slot (full>0 AND hold-out>0 AND marginal ADDS
al portafoglio live AND corr XS01<0.6, con jackknife drop-one-month).

Find: 42/257 config earns_slot=True, ma TUTTE con corr TP01 -0.2..-0.4 e PnL ~solo 2025.
Verify (verify_survivors.py, 3 scettici deterministici):
 - S1 redundancy: cluster low-vol = UNA scommessa (XV01=XU02=1.00, XV02/XV03 r 0.44-0.67);
   XM09/XL02/XS06b/XR02 distinti (corr media off-diag +0.20).
 - S2 short-beta: cluster low-vol carica 0.44-0.70 su short-market -> NON market-neutral,
   e' un tilt short-alt-beta di regime. XM09(0.08)/XR02(-0.21) NON short-beta.
 - S3 per-anno: cluster low-vol decade (XV01/XU02 2026 -0.09); XL02 morto (2025 -0.14,
   2026 -0.43); XM09 (0.82/0.50/0.74) e XR02 (0.84/0.40/2.68) positivi in tutti e 3 gli anni.

Esito: nessuna sleeve nuova. Cluster low-vol RIGETTATO (regime-bet), XL02 RIGETTATO (overfit).
2 LEAD genuini (XM09 trend-gated x-sec momentum, XR02 reversal vol-gated) -> forward-monitor,
non deployabili (panel 2.5y regime unico + STAT-MODE esecuzione). Portafoglio live invariato.

Incluso anche options_vrp_managed.py (A/B VRP01 hold-to-expiry vs gestione attiva del doc
credit-spread): la gestione attiva DISTRUGGE l'edge (combo FULL managed Sh -1.29 vs HtE +0.96,
il delta-exit taglia i vincenti) -> scartata, VRP01 resta hold-to-expiry.

Diari: 2026-06-20-xsec-strategies-sweep.md, 2026-06-20-vrp-active-management.md.
gitignore: data/paper_portfolio/ (stato runtime paper) + scripts/research/xsec/runs/out/ (output rigenerabile).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-20 21:36:57 +00:00

110 lines
3.8 KiB
Python

"""XD01 — Low-skew / anti-lottery cross-sectional strategy.
Score = -roll_skew(ret, 60): short high-skew "lottery" alts, long low-skew alts.
Rationale: lottery-preference premium — investors overpay for positive-skew assets
(right-tail lottery tickets), so they should earn lower returns; negative-skew assets
are underpriced relative to their systematic risk.
Grid (<=5 calls):
1. Baseline: "majors" (19 XS01 universe), H=10, k=5, L/S
2. Wider universe: "all" (~49 alts), H=10, k=5, L/S
3. Vary rebalance period: "all", H=5, k=5, L/S (more frequent)
4. Vary top-k: "all", H=10, k=7, L/S (more diversified)
5. Combined: -skew60 + -skew30 blend (multi-horizon), "all", H=10, k=5, L/S
"""
import sys
sys.path.insert(0, "/opt/docker/PythagorasGoal/scripts/research/xsec")
import xslib as xs
import numpy as np
SKEW_WIN = 60 # lookback for rolling skew (days)
SKEW_WIN2 = 30 # shorter lookback for blend
def score_anti_lottery(P, win=SKEW_WIN):
"""Anti-lottery score: negate rolling skew so LOW-skew assets score HIGH (long)."""
sk = xs.roll_skew(P.ret, win) # (n_days x n_assets); higher skew = lottery
return -sk # higher = lower skew = long
def score_anti_lottery_blend(P, w1=SKEW_WIN, w2=SKEW_WIN2):
"""Multi-horizon blend of negated skews (cross-sectionally z-scored before blend)."""
sk1 = xs.xs_zscore(-xs.roll_skew(P.ret, w1))
sk2 = xs.xs_zscore(-xs.roll_skew(P.ret, w2))
return 0.5 * sk1 + 0.5 * sk2
if __name__ == "__main__":
results = []
# --- Run 1: majors universe, H=10, k=5, L/S ---
print("Running XD01-v1: majors, H=10, k=5, L/S ...")
rep1 = xs.study_xs(
"XD01-v1-majors",
lambda P: score_anti_lottery(P, 60),
universe="majors",
H=10, k=5, long_short=True,
)
print(xs.fmt(rep1))
results.append(rep1)
# --- Run 2: all universe, H=10, k=5, L/S ---
print("\nRunning XD01-v2: all, H=10, k=5, L/S ...")
rep2 = xs.study_xs(
"XD01-v2-all",
lambda P: score_anti_lottery(P, 60),
universe="all",
H=10, k=5, long_short=True,
)
print(xs.fmt(rep2))
results.append(rep2)
# --- Run 3: all, H=5 (more frequent rebalance), k=5, L/S ---
print("\nRunning XD01-v3: all, H=5, k=5, L/S ...")
rep3 = xs.study_xs(
"XD01-v3-H5",
lambda P: score_anti_lottery(P, 60),
universe="all",
H=5, k=5, long_short=True,
)
print(xs.fmt(rep3))
results.append(rep3)
# --- Run 4: all, H=10, k=7, L/S (more diversified) ---
print("\nRunning XD01-v4: all, H=10, k=7, L/S ...")
rep4 = xs.study_xs(
"XD01-v4-k7",
lambda P: score_anti_lottery(P, 60),
universe="all",
H=10, k=7, long_short=True,
)
print(xs.fmt(rep4))
results.append(rep4)
# --- Run 5: blend multi-horizon skew, all, H=10, k=5, L/S ---
print("\nRunning XD01-v5: blend skew30+60, all, H=10, k=5, L/S ...")
rep5 = xs.study_xs(
"XD01-v5-blend",
lambda P: score_anti_lottery_blend(P, 60, 30),
universe="all",
H=10, k=5, long_short=True,
)
print(xs.fmt(rep5))
results.append(rep5)
# --- Pick best config by: earns_slot > holdout sharpe > full sharpe > distinctness ---
def rank_key(r):
earns = int(r["earns_slot"])
h_sh = r["holdout"].get("sharpe", -99)
f_sh = r["full"]["sharpe"]
distinct = 1.0 - abs(r["corr_xs01"] or 1.0) # higher = more distinct
verdict_score = {"ADDS": 3, "NEUTRAL": 2, "DILUTES": 1, "REDUNDANT": 0, "N/A": 0}.get(
r["marginal"].get("verdict", "N/A"), 0)
return (earns, verdict_score, h_sh, f_sh, distinct)
best = max(results, key=rank_key)
print("\n" + "=" * 60)
print("BEST CONFIG:")
print(xs.fmt(best))
print("JSON:", xs.as_json(best))