Files
Adriano Dal Pastro 9612560479 research(xsec): sweep cross-sectional su Hyperliquid (43 script/257 config) + verifica avversariale
Nuova harness condivisa xslib.py (panel HL certificato, score per-asset causale, book
long-k/short-k vol-targeted leak-free) + 43 script in runs/ su 11 famiglie (MOM/REV/VOL/
DIST/LIQ/VAL/STRUCT/UNIV). Scoring = earns_slot (full>0 AND hold-out>0 AND marginal ADDS
al portafoglio live AND corr XS01<0.6, con jackknife drop-one-month).

Find: 42/257 config earns_slot=True, ma TUTTE con corr TP01 -0.2..-0.4 e PnL ~solo 2025.
Verify (verify_survivors.py, 3 scettici deterministici):
 - S1 redundancy: cluster low-vol = UNA scommessa (XV01=XU02=1.00, XV02/XV03 r 0.44-0.67);
   XM09/XL02/XS06b/XR02 distinti (corr media off-diag +0.20).
 - S2 short-beta: cluster low-vol carica 0.44-0.70 su short-market -> NON market-neutral,
   e' un tilt short-alt-beta di regime. XM09(0.08)/XR02(-0.21) NON short-beta.
 - S3 per-anno: cluster low-vol decade (XV01/XU02 2026 -0.09); XL02 morto (2025 -0.14,
   2026 -0.43); XM09 (0.82/0.50/0.74) e XR02 (0.84/0.40/2.68) positivi in tutti e 3 gli anni.

Esito: nessuna sleeve nuova. Cluster low-vol RIGETTATO (regime-bet), XL02 RIGETTATO (overfit).
2 LEAD genuini (XM09 trend-gated x-sec momentum, XR02 reversal vol-gated) -> forward-monitor,
non deployabili (panel 2.5y regime unico + STAT-MODE esecuzione). Portafoglio live invariato.

Incluso anche options_vrp_managed.py (A/B VRP01 hold-to-expiry vs gestione attiva del doc
credit-spread): la gestione attiva DISTRUGGE l'edge (combo FULL managed Sh -1.29 vs HtE +0.96,
il delta-exit taglia i vincenti) -> scartata, VRP01 resta hold-to-expiry.

Diari: 2026-06-20-xsec-strategies-sweep.md, 2026-06-20-vrp-active-management.md.
gitignore: data/paper_portfolio/ (stato runtime paper) + scripts/research/xsec/runs/out/ (output rigenerabile).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-20 21:36:57 +00:00

102 lines
3.4 KiB
Python

"""XV05 — Low Max-Drawdown Anomaly
Score = -rolling_maxdrawdown(close, W) over the past W bars.
Prefer assets with smooth price history (low drawdown) for long,
prefer highly-drawn-down assets for short.
Grid: vary W (30, 60, 90), universe (majors, all), H (10).
<=5 study_xs calls total.
"""
import sys
sys.path.insert(0, "/opt/docker/PythagorasGoal/scripts/research/xsec")
import xslib as xs
import numpy as np
def rolling_maxdd(close, W):
"""Causal rolling max-drawdown over the past W bars.
At row i: max drawdown of the window [i-W+1 .. i].
Returns matrix (n_days x n_assets). NaN for first W-1 rows.
Higher = worse drawdown (more negative).
"""
n, A = close.shape
out = np.full((n, A), np.nan)
for i in range(W - 1, n):
window = close[i - W + 1: i + 1] # shape (W, A) — causal: data <= i
# rolling peak up to each bar within window
peak = np.maximum.accumulate(window, axis=0)
dd = (window - peak) / peak # drawdown at each bar (<=0)
out[i] = np.nanmin(dd, axis=0) # worst drawdown in window (most negative)
return out
def score_fn_w60(P):
"""Score = -maxDD(W=60): prefer LOW drawdown (smooth equity)."""
return -rolling_maxdd(P.close, 60)
def score_fn_w30(P):
"""Score = -maxDD(W=30): shorter memory."""
return -rolling_maxdd(P.close, 30)
def score_fn_w90(P):
"""Score = -maxDD(W=90): longer memory."""
return -rolling_maxdd(P.close, 90)
def score_fn_w60_blend(P):
"""Blend: average score from W=30 and W=90 (multi-horizon like XS01 blend)."""
s30 = -rolling_maxdd(P.close, 30)
s90 = -rolling_maxdd(P.close, 90)
return xs.xs_zscore(s30) + xs.xs_zscore(s90)
if __name__ == "__main__":
print("=== XV05: Low Max-Drawdown Anomaly ===\n")
# Run 1: canonical W=60, majors universe, H=10, k=5, long-short
print("--- Run 1: W=60, majors, H=10, k=5, LS ---")
r1 = xs.study_xs("XV05-W60-maj", score_fn_w60, universe="majors", H=10, k=5, long_short=True)
print(xs.fmt(r1))
print()
# Run 2: W=60, all universe (49 alts)
print("--- Run 2: W=60, all, H=10, k=5, LS ---")
r2 = xs.study_xs("XV05-W60-all", score_fn_w60, universe="all", H=10, k=5, long_short=True)
print(xs.fmt(r2))
print()
# Run 3: W=30, majors
print("--- Run 3: W=30, majors, H=10, k=5, LS ---")
r3 = xs.study_xs("XV05-W30-maj", score_fn_w30, universe="majors", H=10, k=5, long_short=True)
print(xs.fmt(r3))
print()
# Run 4: W=90, majors
print("--- Run 4: W=90, majors, H=10, k=5, LS ---")
r4 = xs.study_xs("XV05-W90-maj", score_fn_w90, universe="majors", H=10, k=5, long_short=True)
print(xs.fmt(r4))
print()
# Run 5: blend W=30+W=90, all universe
print("--- Run 5: Blend W30+W90, all, H=10, k=5, LS ---")
r5 = xs.study_xs("XV05-BLENDall", score_fn_w60_blend, universe="all", H=10, k=5, long_short=True)
print(xs.fmt(r5))
print()
# Pick best by earns_slot, then hold-out sharpe, then distinctness from XS01
results = [r1, r2, r3, r4, r5]
names = ["W60-maj", "W60-all", "W30-maj", "W90-maj", "Blend-all"]
def score_key(r):
earns = 1 if r["earns_slot"] else 0
hold_sh = r["holdout"].get("sharpe", -99)
full_sh = r["full"]["sharpe"]
xs01_corr = abs(r["corr_xs01"] or 1.0)
return (earns, hold_sh, full_sh, -xs01_corr)
best = max(results, key=score_key)
print("\n=== BEST CONFIG ===")
print(xs.fmt(best))
print("JSON:", xs.as_json(best))