9612560479
Nuova harness condivisa xslib.py (panel HL certificato, score per-asset causale, book long-k/short-k vol-targeted leak-free) + 43 script in runs/ su 11 famiglie (MOM/REV/VOL/ DIST/LIQ/VAL/STRUCT/UNIV). Scoring = earns_slot (full>0 AND hold-out>0 AND marginal ADDS al portafoglio live AND corr XS01<0.6, con jackknife drop-one-month). Find: 42/257 config earns_slot=True, ma TUTTE con corr TP01 -0.2..-0.4 e PnL ~solo 2025. Verify (verify_survivors.py, 3 scettici deterministici): - S1 redundancy: cluster low-vol = UNA scommessa (XV01=XU02=1.00, XV02/XV03 r 0.44-0.67); XM09/XL02/XS06b/XR02 distinti (corr media off-diag +0.20). - S2 short-beta: cluster low-vol carica 0.44-0.70 su short-market -> NON market-neutral, e' un tilt short-alt-beta di regime. XM09(0.08)/XR02(-0.21) NON short-beta. - S3 per-anno: cluster low-vol decade (XV01/XU02 2026 -0.09); XL02 morto (2025 -0.14, 2026 -0.43); XM09 (0.82/0.50/0.74) e XR02 (0.84/0.40/2.68) positivi in tutti e 3 gli anni. Esito: nessuna sleeve nuova. Cluster low-vol RIGETTATO (regime-bet), XL02 RIGETTATO (overfit). 2 LEAD genuini (XM09 trend-gated x-sec momentum, XR02 reversal vol-gated) -> forward-monitor, non deployabili (panel 2.5y regime unico + STAT-MODE esecuzione). Portafoglio live invariato. Incluso anche options_vrp_managed.py (A/B VRP01 hold-to-expiry vs gestione attiva del doc credit-spread): la gestione attiva DISTRUGGE l'edge (combo FULL managed Sh -1.29 vs HtE +0.96, il delta-exit taglia i vincenti) -> scartata, VRP01 resta hold-to-expiry. Diari: 2026-06-20-xsec-strategies-sweep.md, 2026-06-20-vrp-active-management.md. gitignore: data/paper_portfolio/ (stato runtime paper) + scripts/research/xsec/runs/out/ (output rigenerabile). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
99 lines
3.1 KiB
Python
99 lines
3.1 KiB
Python
"""XM05 — Momentum Acceleration
|
|
MECHANISM: Score = past_return(close, L_short) - past_return(close, L_long)
|
|
i.e. is momentum ACCELERATING? The idea: assets that are outperforming
|
|
recently vs. their longer-run momentum are gaining momentum -> rank them
|
|
high. Assets that were strong long-term but are slowing down -> rank low.
|
|
L_short=20, L_long=60 (canonical config).
|
|
|
|
Grid: vary universe (all/majors), H (5/10), and L_short param
|
|
to find the best config within <=5 backtests.
|
|
|
|
Distinctness target: if score is correlated to raw momentum (XS01), it's just XS01.
|
|
If acceleration captures something different (regime change, reversal of leaders), it
|
|
could be distinct and add to portfolio.
|
|
"""
|
|
import sys
|
|
sys.path.insert(0, "/opt/docker/PythagorasGoal/scripts/research/xsec")
|
|
import xslib as xs
|
|
import numpy as np
|
|
|
|
print("XM05 — Momentum Acceleration (L_short - L_long)")
|
|
print("=" * 60)
|
|
|
|
|
|
def mom_accel(close, L_short, L_long):
|
|
"""Score = short-term return minus long-term return (causal). Higher = accelerating."""
|
|
r_short = xs.past_return(close, L_short)
|
|
r_long = xs.past_return(close, L_long)
|
|
return r_short - r_long
|
|
|
|
|
|
# --- 5 targeted backtests ---
|
|
|
|
# 1) Canonical config: all universe, L_short=20, L_long=60, H=10, LS
|
|
rep1 = xs.study_xs(
|
|
"XM05_ALL_20_60",
|
|
lambda P: mom_accel(P.close, 20, 60),
|
|
universe="all", H=10, k=5, long_short=True
|
|
)
|
|
print(xs.fmt(rep1))
|
|
print("JSON:", xs.as_json(rep1))
|
|
print()
|
|
|
|
# 2) Majors universe (19 XS01 assets), same canonical L_short=20, L_long=60
|
|
rep2 = xs.study_xs(
|
|
"XM05_MAJ_20_60",
|
|
lambda P: mom_accel(P.close, 20, 60),
|
|
universe="majors", H=10, k=5, long_short=True
|
|
)
|
|
print(xs.fmt(rep2))
|
|
print("JSON:", xs.as_json(rep2))
|
|
print()
|
|
|
|
# 3) All universe, shorter window: L_short=10, L_long=30 (faster acceleration signal)
|
|
rep3 = xs.study_xs(
|
|
"XM05_ALL_10_30",
|
|
lambda P: mom_accel(P.close, 10, 30),
|
|
universe="all", H=10, k=5, long_short=True
|
|
)
|
|
print(xs.fmt(rep3))
|
|
print("JSON:", xs.as_json(rep3))
|
|
print()
|
|
|
|
# 4) All universe, L_short=20, L_long=60, longer holding period H=20
|
|
rep4 = xs.study_xs(
|
|
"XM05_ALL_20_60_H20",
|
|
lambda P: mom_accel(P.close, 20, 60),
|
|
universe="all", H=20, k=5, long_short=True
|
|
)
|
|
print(xs.fmt(rep4))
|
|
print("JSON:", xs.as_json(rep4))
|
|
print()
|
|
|
|
# 5) All universe, longer windows: L_short=30, L_long=90 (medium-term acceleration)
|
|
rep5 = xs.study_xs(
|
|
"XM05_ALL_30_90",
|
|
lambda P: mom_accel(P.close, 30, 90),
|
|
universe="all", H=10, k=5, long_short=True
|
|
)
|
|
print(xs.fmt(rep5))
|
|
print("JSON:", xs.as_json(rep5))
|
|
print()
|
|
|
|
# Pick best: prefer earns_slot, then hold-out sharpe, then distinctness from XS01
|
|
all_reps = [rep1, rep2, rep3, rep4, rep5]
|
|
|
|
def score_rep(r):
|
|
earns = int(r["earns_slot"])
|
|
hold_sh = r["holdout"].get("sharpe", -9)
|
|
full_sh = r["full"]["sharpe"]
|
|
corr_xs01 = r.get("corr_xs01") or 1.0
|
|
distinctness = 1 - abs(corr_xs01) # higher = more distinct
|
|
return (earns, hold_sh, full_sh, distinctness)
|
|
|
|
best = max(all_reps, key=score_rep)
|
|
print("=" * 60)
|
|
print(f"BEST CONFIG: {best['name']}")
|
|
print(xs.fmt(best))
|
|
print("JSON:", xs.as_json(best))
|