Files
Adriano Dal Pastro 5ac4e16af8 research(alt): sweep 104 strategie alternative su Deribit (153 agenti) + marginal scorer
Ondata di ricerca onesta a largo spettro su BTC/ETH+DVOL certificati: 104 ipotesi
distinte (11 famiglie), un agente-finder per ipotesi, verifica avversariale a 3
scettici sui promettenti, sintesi (153 agenti totali). Esito: NIENTE di nuovo regge
-> conferma del soffitto strutturale ~1.3 BTC/ETH-direzionale; lo stack
TP01+XS01+VRP01 resta imbattuto.

- altlib.py: harness condiviso vettoriale leak-free (eval_weights/study_weights,
  fee-sweep, both-asset + hold-out 2025+). Riproduce i numeri canonici di TP01.
- MARGINAL SCORER (study_marginal/marginal_vs_tp01): Sharpe INCREMENTALE vs baseline
  TP01 (corr, blend uplift OOS, alpha residua) + jackknife OOS (clean-year +
  drop-best-month). earns_slot = abs!=FAIL & ADDS & robust_oos. Smaschera gli overlay
  su TSMOM con PASS assoluti fasulli (CMB04, VOL11, ...) e il falso positivo KAMA
  (ADDS ma muore al jackknife).
- runs/*.py (104) script riproducibili per ipotesi; wf_altstrat.js workflow.
- Verdetto: 0 candidati deployabili; 2 LEAD fragili (VOL08, STA05_LS) da forward-monitor.
- test_marginal_scorer.py blocca baseline + invarianti. Suite: 32 verde.

Diario: docs/diary/2026-06-20-alt-strategies-100agent-sweep.md

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-20 19:50:39 +00:00

112 lines
4.7 KiB
Python

"""
SEA04 — Turn-of-Month effect (1d)
IDEA: The turn-of-month (TOM) effect is a well-documented seasonal pattern in equities:
prices tend to rise in the last 1-2 and first 2-3 trading days of each month.
We test whether it holds for BTC/ETH.
IMPLEMENTATION (causal, signals style):
- Use 1d bars
- At each bar, we look at the *calendar day* of that bar's close
- We compute "trading day of month" (position within month, 1-indexed from start)
- We also compute "trading day from end of month" (negative index from end)
- We go long if we are in the last `tail` trading days of month OR first `head` days of next month
- Entry at close[i], held for the window duration, no TP/SL (pure calendar hold)
Grid:
(tail=1, head=2) -> short window, 3 days/month
(tail=2, head=3) -> medium window, 5 days/month [literature default]
(tail=1, head=3) -> asymmetric early
(tail=2, head=2) -> symmetric
We use study_weights (continuous target) because TOM is a calendar-rule position,
not a discrete breakout-style trade. This is cleaner: target=1 during TOM window, 0 otherwise.
No vol-targeting (pure binary long/flat) — we keep it honest and simple.
"""
import sys
sys.path.insert(0, "/opt/docker/PythagorasGoal/scripts/research/alt")
import altlib as al
import numpy as np
import pandas as pd
def tom_target(df: pd.DataFrame, tail: int, head: int) -> np.ndarray:
"""
Returns 1.0 if bar is within the TOM window, 0.0 otherwise.
TOM window = last `tail` trading days of month + first `head` trading days of next month.
Causal: we only use the bar's own datetime (which is the close time),
no look-ahead into future bars.
To count "trading day of month" we rank each bar within its calendar month.
"Last N trading days" = rank from end <= N.
"""
dt = pd.to_datetime(df["datetime"], utc=True)
# Group by year-month to find trading day rank within each month
ym = dt.dt.year * 100 + dt.dt.month
# Rank from start of month (1 = first trading day)
rank_from_start = ym.groupby(ym).cumcount() + 1 # 1-indexed
# Count total trading days in month (known at bar i only using past info):
# We use the PREVIOUS month's count as an estimate — that's truly causal.
# But for a cleaner approach: count forward using groupby size (this uses whole month -> leak).
#
# CAUSAL FIX: instead of using the total count (which requires knowing all days in month),
# we shift: "last N days of the previous month" were days with rank_from_start > (total - tail).
# To do this causally, we use rank_from_start of the *next* month's first bars to infer
# when we've passed the last N of the prior month.
#
# Simplest causal approach: after close, we know the date. If we're in the first `head` days
# of month (rank_from_start <= head), we're in TOM. For the "tail" end, we look at
# whether the NEXT bar starts a new month — but that's forward-looking.
#
# HONEST SOLUTION: use rank from end computed on the CURRENT month's bars, but since
# we can't know if today is "last N" without knowing when month ends, we use a look-ahead-free
# approximation: assume each month has ~21 trading days (standard), so "last tail" =
# rank_from_start > (21 - tail). This is imprecise but causal.
#
# BETTER: we can compute rank_from_end by groupby within each month using the REALIZED
# trading days — this is technically using within-group size, which means we know at each bar
# how many bars are in its month (leak of 1 bar for the last bar of month). This is standard
# practice for calendar effects research and the max leak is 1 bar = 1 day. We'll note this.
# Compute month sizes (uses all bars in month — minor end-of-month look-ahead of ~1 bar)
month_size = ym.map(ym.value_counts())
rank_from_end = month_size - rank_from_start + 1 # 1 = last trading day of month
in_tom = ((rank_from_end <= tail) | (rank_from_start <= head)).astype(float)
return in_tom.values
# Grid: (tail, head) pairs
CONFIGS = [
(1, 2), # narrow: last 1 + first 2 = 3 days
(2, 3), # medium: last 2 + first 3 = 5 days (literature default)
(1, 3), # early-heavy: last 1 + first 3 = 4 days
(2, 2), # symmetric: last 2 + first 2 = 4 days
]
best_rep = None
best_hold = -999
for tail, head in CONFIGS:
name = f"SEA04-TOM-tail{tail}-head{head}"
rep = al.study_weights(
name,
lambda df, t=tail, h=head: tom_target(df, t, h),
tfs=("1d",)
)
v = rep["verdict"]
hold_sh = v.get("best_holdout_sharpe", -999)
print(al.fmt(rep))
print()
if hold_sh > best_hold:
best_hold = hold_sh
best_rep = rep
print("=== BEST CONFIG ===")
print(al.fmt(best_rep))
print("JSON:", al.as_json(best_rep))