Files
PythagorasGoal/scripts/research/xsec/runs/XU02.py
T
Adriano Dal Pastro 9612560479 research(xsec): sweep cross-sectional su Hyperliquid (43 script/257 config) + verifica avversariale
Nuova harness condivisa xslib.py (panel HL certificato, score per-asset causale, book
long-k/short-k vol-targeted leak-free) + 43 script in runs/ su 11 famiglie (MOM/REV/VOL/
DIST/LIQ/VAL/STRUCT/UNIV). Scoring = earns_slot (full>0 AND hold-out>0 AND marginal ADDS
al portafoglio live AND corr XS01<0.6, con jackknife drop-one-month).

Find: 42/257 config earns_slot=True, ma TUTTE con corr TP01 -0.2..-0.4 e PnL ~solo 2025.
Verify (verify_survivors.py, 3 scettici deterministici):
 - S1 redundancy: cluster low-vol = UNA scommessa (XV01=XU02=1.00, XV02/XV03 r 0.44-0.67);
   XM09/XL02/XS06b/XR02 distinti (corr media off-diag +0.20).
 - S2 short-beta: cluster low-vol carica 0.44-0.70 su short-market -> NON market-neutral,
   e' un tilt short-alt-beta di regime. XM09(0.08)/XR02(-0.21) NON short-beta.
 - S3 per-anno: cluster low-vol decade (XV01/XU02 2026 -0.09); XL02 morto (2025 -0.14,
   2026 -0.43); XM09 (0.82/0.50/0.74) e XR02 (0.84/0.40/2.68) positivi in tutti e 3 gli anni.

Esito: nessuna sleeve nuova. Cluster low-vol RIGETTATO (regime-bet), XL02 RIGETTATO (overfit).
2 LEAD genuini (XM09 trend-gated x-sec momentum, XR02 reversal vol-gated) -> forward-monitor,
non deployabili (panel 2.5y regime unico + STAT-MODE esecuzione). Portafoglio live invariato.

Incluso anche options_vrp_managed.py (A/B VRP01 hold-to-expiry vs gestione attiva del doc
credit-spread): la gestione attiva DISTRUGGE l'edge (combo FULL managed Sh -1.29 vs HtE +0.96,
il delta-exit taglia i vincenti) -> scartata, VRP01 resta hold-to-expiry.

Diari: 2026-06-20-xsec-strategies-sweep.md, 2026-06-20-vrp-active-management.md.
gitignore: data/paper_portfolio/ (stato runtime paper) + scripts/research/xsec/runs/out/ (output rigenerabile).

Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
2026-06-20 21:36:57 +00:00

121 lines
4.0 KiB
Python

"""XU02 — Rebalance/Holding Sweep (Low-Vol + Momentum)
MECHANISM: Study how holding period H and portfolio size k interact with signal quality.
Two signals: (1) pure momentum blend (z30+z90 same as XS01), (2) low-vol rank (short volatile, long stable).
Goal: find whether a DIFFERENT H/k pair or signal gives something DISTINCT from XS01.
Hypothesis:
- XS01 uses H=10, k=5 (momentum). A longer H reduces turnover, captures slower signal decay.
- Low-vol selection (long stable alts, short volatile ones) is conceptually orthogonal to momentum.
- Sweep: H in {5,10,20,30}, k in {3,5,8}, signal in {momentum, low_vol}.
- Keep <=5 backtests: focus on the most contrasting configs.
Grid (5 backtests):
1. MOM H=5 k=5 — fast rebalance, same as XS01 direction, more turnover
2. MOM H=30 k=5 — slow rebalance, lower turnover, tests signal persistence
3. LVOL H=10 k=5 — low-vol signal at standard H/k (conceptually distinct from momentum)
4. LVOL H=20 k=5 — low-vol with slower rebalance
5. LVOL H=10 k=3 — low-vol tight portfolio, more concentrated
"""
import sys
sys.path.insert(0, "/opt/docker/PythagorasGoal/scripts/research/xsec")
import xslib as xs
import numpy as np
print("XU02 — Rebalance/Holding Sweep (Low-Vol + Momentum)")
print("=" * 60)
def mom_blend(P):
"""Z-blend of 30d and 90d momentum (same signal as XS01)."""
z30 = xs.xs_zscore(xs.past_return(P.close, 30))
z90 = xs.xs_zscore(xs.past_return(P.close, 90))
return np.nanmean(np.stack([z30, z90], axis=0), axis=0)
def low_vol(P):
"""Low-vol signal: score = -rolling_std(ret, 30). Higher score = lower vol = long.
Cross-sectionaly ranks alts: stable (low realized vol) go long, volatile go short."""
rv = xs.roll_std(P.ret, 30)
return -rv # negate: higher = lower vol = prefer long
# 1) Momentum H=5 k=5 — fast rebalance (more turnover, tests short-term signal)
rep1 = xs.study_xs(
"XU02_MOM_H5k5",
mom_blend,
universe="majors", H=5, k=5, long_short=True
)
print(xs.fmt(rep1))
print("JSON:", xs.as_json(rep1))
print()
# 2) Momentum H=30 k=5 — slow rebalance, lower turnover, tests signal persistence
rep2 = xs.study_xs(
"XU02_MOM_H30k5",
mom_blend,
universe="majors", H=30, k=5, long_short=True
)
print(xs.fmt(rep2))
print("JSON:", xs.as_json(rep2))
print()
# 3) Low-vol H=10 k=5 — standard H/k but conceptually distinct signal
rep3 = xs.study_xs(
"XU02_LVOL_H10k5",
low_vol,
universe="majors", H=10, k=5, long_short=True
)
print(xs.fmt(rep3))
print("JSON:", xs.as_json(rep3))
print()
# 4) Low-vol H=20 k=5 — slower rebalance, low-vol is a structural trait (changes slowly)
rep4 = xs.study_xs(
"XU02_LVOL_H20k5",
low_vol,
universe="majors", H=20, k=5, long_short=True
)
print(xs.fmt(rep4))
print("JSON:", xs.as_json(rep4))
print()
# 5) Low-vol H=10 k=3 — tighter portfolio (top/bottom 3 most extreme)
rep5 = xs.study_xs(
"XU02_LVOL_H10k3",
low_vol,
universe="majors", H=10, k=3, long_short=True
)
print(xs.fmt(rep5))
print("JSON:", xs.as_json(rep5))
print()
# Summary
print("=" * 60)
print("SUMMARY: All 5 configs ranked by hold-out Sharpe")
all_reps = [rep1, rep2, rep3, rep4, rep5]
ranked = sorted(all_reps, key=lambda r: r["holdout"].get("sharpe", -999), reverse=True)
for r in ranked:
h_sh = r["holdout"].get("sharpe", 0)
f_sh = r["full"]["sharpe"]
c_xs01 = r["corr_xs01"]
verdict = r["marginal"].get("verdict", "N/A")
earns = r["earns_slot"]
print(f" {r['name']:25s} FULL={f_sh:+.2f} HOLD={h_sh:+.2f} corr_xs01={c_xs01} "
f"verdict={verdict} earns_slot={earns}")
# Pick best by marginal robustness -> earns_slot -> hold-out -> distinctness
best = None
for r in ranked:
if r["earns_slot"]:
best = r
break
if best is None:
# fallback: best hold-out with corr_xs01 < 0.6
candidates = [r for r in ranked if (r.get("corr_xs01") or 1.0) < 0.6 and r["holdout"].get("sharpe", 0) > 0]
best = candidates[0] if candidates else ranked[0]
print()
print("BEST CONFIG:")
print(xs.fmt(best))
print("JSON:", xs.as_json(best))