9612560479
Nuova harness condivisa xslib.py (panel HL certificato, score per-asset causale, book long-k/short-k vol-targeted leak-free) + 43 script in runs/ su 11 famiglie (MOM/REV/VOL/ DIST/LIQ/VAL/STRUCT/UNIV). Scoring = earns_slot (full>0 AND hold-out>0 AND marginal ADDS al portafoglio live AND corr XS01<0.6, con jackknife drop-one-month). Find: 42/257 config earns_slot=True, ma TUTTE con corr TP01 -0.2..-0.4 e PnL ~solo 2025. Verify (verify_survivors.py, 3 scettici deterministici): - S1 redundancy: cluster low-vol = UNA scommessa (XV01=XU02=1.00, XV02/XV03 r 0.44-0.67); XM09/XL02/XS06b/XR02 distinti (corr media off-diag +0.20). - S2 short-beta: cluster low-vol carica 0.44-0.70 su short-market -> NON market-neutral, e' un tilt short-alt-beta di regime. XM09(0.08)/XR02(-0.21) NON short-beta. - S3 per-anno: cluster low-vol decade (XV01/XU02 2026 -0.09); XL02 morto (2025 -0.14, 2026 -0.43); XM09 (0.82/0.50/0.74) e XR02 (0.84/0.40/2.68) positivi in tutti e 3 gli anni. Esito: nessuna sleeve nuova. Cluster low-vol RIGETTATO (regime-bet), XL02 RIGETTATO (overfit). 2 LEAD genuini (XM09 trend-gated x-sec momentum, XR02 reversal vol-gated) -> forward-monitor, non deployabili (panel 2.5y regime unico + STAT-MODE esecuzione). Portafoglio live invariato. Incluso anche options_vrp_managed.py (A/B VRP01 hold-to-expiry vs gestione attiva del doc credit-spread): la gestione attiva DISTRUGGE l'edge (combo FULL managed Sh -1.29 vs HtE +0.96, il delta-exit taglia i vincenti) -> scartata, VRP01 resta hold-to-expiry. Diari: 2026-06-20-xsec-strategies-sweep.md, 2026-06-20-vrp-active-management.md. gitignore: data/paper_portfolio/ (stato runtime paper) + scripts/research/xsec/runs/out/ (output rigenerabile). Co-Authored-By: Claude Opus 4.8 (1M context) <noreply@anthropic.com>
110 lines
3.8 KiB
Python
110 lines
3.8 KiB
Python
"""XD01 — Low-skew / anti-lottery cross-sectional strategy.
|
|
|
|
Score = -roll_skew(ret, 60): short high-skew "lottery" alts, long low-skew alts.
|
|
Rationale: lottery-preference premium — investors overpay for positive-skew assets
|
|
(right-tail lottery tickets), so they should earn lower returns; negative-skew assets
|
|
are underpriced relative to their systematic risk.
|
|
|
|
Grid (<=5 calls):
|
|
1. Baseline: "majors" (19 XS01 universe), H=10, k=5, L/S
|
|
2. Wider universe: "all" (~49 alts), H=10, k=5, L/S
|
|
3. Vary rebalance period: "all", H=5, k=5, L/S (more frequent)
|
|
4. Vary top-k: "all", H=10, k=7, L/S (more diversified)
|
|
5. Combined: -skew60 + -skew30 blend (multi-horizon), "all", H=10, k=5, L/S
|
|
"""
|
|
import sys
|
|
sys.path.insert(0, "/opt/docker/PythagorasGoal/scripts/research/xsec")
|
|
import xslib as xs
|
|
import numpy as np
|
|
|
|
SKEW_WIN = 60 # lookback for rolling skew (days)
|
|
SKEW_WIN2 = 30 # shorter lookback for blend
|
|
|
|
|
|
def score_anti_lottery(P, win=SKEW_WIN):
|
|
"""Anti-lottery score: negate rolling skew so LOW-skew assets score HIGH (long)."""
|
|
sk = xs.roll_skew(P.ret, win) # (n_days x n_assets); higher skew = lottery
|
|
return -sk # higher = lower skew = long
|
|
|
|
|
|
def score_anti_lottery_blend(P, w1=SKEW_WIN, w2=SKEW_WIN2):
|
|
"""Multi-horizon blend of negated skews (cross-sectionally z-scored before blend)."""
|
|
sk1 = xs.xs_zscore(-xs.roll_skew(P.ret, w1))
|
|
sk2 = xs.xs_zscore(-xs.roll_skew(P.ret, w2))
|
|
return 0.5 * sk1 + 0.5 * sk2
|
|
|
|
|
|
if __name__ == "__main__":
|
|
results = []
|
|
|
|
# --- Run 1: majors universe, H=10, k=5, L/S ---
|
|
print("Running XD01-v1: majors, H=10, k=5, L/S ...")
|
|
rep1 = xs.study_xs(
|
|
"XD01-v1-majors",
|
|
lambda P: score_anti_lottery(P, 60),
|
|
universe="majors",
|
|
H=10, k=5, long_short=True,
|
|
)
|
|
print(xs.fmt(rep1))
|
|
results.append(rep1)
|
|
|
|
# --- Run 2: all universe, H=10, k=5, L/S ---
|
|
print("\nRunning XD01-v2: all, H=10, k=5, L/S ...")
|
|
rep2 = xs.study_xs(
|
|
"XD01-v2-all",
|
|
lambda P: score_anti_lottery(P, 60),
|
|
universe="all",
|
|
H=10, k=5, long_short=True,
|
|
)
|
|
print(xs.fmt(rep2))
|
|
results.append(rep2)
|
|
|
|
# --- Run 3: all, H=5 (more frequent rebalance), k=5, L/S ---
|
|
print("\nRunning XD01-v3: all, H=5, k=5, L/S ...")
|
|
rep3 = xs.study_xs(
|
|
"XD01-v3-H5",
|
|
lambda P: score_anti_lottery(P, 60),
|
|
universe="all",
|
|
H=5, k=5, long_short=True,
|
|
)
|
|
print(xs.fmt(rep3))
|
|
results.append(rep3)
|
|
|
|
# --- Run 4: all, H=10, k=7, L/S (more diversified) ---
|
|
print("\nRunning XD01-v4: all, H=10, k=7, L/S ...")
|
|
rep4 = xs.study_xs(
|
|
"XD01-v4-k7",
|
|
lambda P: score_anti_lottery(P, 60),
|
|
universe="all",
|
|
H=10, k=7, long_short=True,
|
|
)
|
|
print(xs.fmt(rep4))
|
|
results.append(rep4)
|
|
|
|
# --- Run 5: blend multi-horizon skew, all, H=10, k=5, L/S ---
|
|
print("\nRunning XD01-v5: blend skew30+60, all, H=10, k=5, L/S ...")
|
|
rep5 = xs.study_xs(
|
|
"XD01-v5-blend",
|
|
lambda P: score_anti_lottery_blend(P, 60, 30),
|
|
universe="all",
|
|
H=10, k=5, long_short=True,
|
|
)
|
|
print(xs.fmt(rep5))
|
|
results.append(rep5)
|
|
|
|
# --- Pick best config by: earns_slot > holdout sharpe > full sharpe > distinctness ---
|
|
def rank_key(r):
|
|
earns = int(r["earns_slot"])
|
|
h_sh = r["holdout"].get("sharpe", -99)
|
|
f_sh = r["full"]["sharpe"]
|
|
distinct = 1.0 - abs(r["corr_xs01"] or 1.0) # higher = more distinct
|
|
verdict_score = {"ADDS": 3, "NEUTRAL": 2, "DILUTES": 1, "REDUNDANT": 0, "N/A": 0}.get(
|
|
r["marginal"].get("verdict", "N/A"), 0)
|
|
return (earns, verdict_score, h_sh, f_sh, distinct)
|
|
|
|
best = max(results, key=rank_key)
|
|
print("\n" + "=" * 60)
|
|
print("BEST CONFIG:")
|
|
print(xs.fmt(best))
|
|
print("JSON:", xs.as_json(best))
|